Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Bush Administration Deceptions Concerning Iraq Continue

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message Scott Bonn

Like putting lipstick on a pig, President Bush is attempting to dress up the Iraq progress report and convince us that his troop surge strategy is working. At the same time, listening to the various 2008 presidential hopefuls from both parties discuss the ongoing debacle in Iraq, you would think that no one was ever in favor of the March, 2003 invasion. In fact, just prior to the invasion, two-thirds of the U.S. public supported going to war.


We now know conclusively that the war in Iraq has been legitimized by an “elite-engineered moral panic” precipitated by the Bush administration which manipulated public opinion concerning the alleged threat posed by Iraq. An elite-engineered moral panic occurs when an elite group deliberately undertakes a campaign to generate and sustain fear on the part of the public over an issue that they recognize not to be terribly harmful to  society.


The key findings of research titled “Whoppers of Mass Deception (WMD): Presidential Rhetoric, Moral Panic and the War in Iraq” demonstrate through empirical analyses of news content and public opinion polls that the distorted and deceptive rhetoric of the Bush administration regarding the alleged threat manufactured public support for the invasion. The events leading up to the war in Iraq meet key requirements of a moral panic: 1) concern, 2) consensus, 3) hostility, and 4) disproportionality.

The first criterion refers to a heightened level of concern about a potential or imagined threat to society. Concern is demonstrated by the findings of this study which reveal that as the number of news articles containing quotes by the Bush administration about the alleged Iraqi threat increased prior to opinion polls, so did public support for the invasion.


Second, there must be substantial agreement in society, although not necessarily universal, that the threat is real and caused by the alleged offenders. Public support for war peaked at 64% just four days prior to the invasion of Iraq, demonstrating widespread consensus.


The third criterion of a moral panic is hostility or moral outrage toward the actors who embody the problem. Following 9/11, President Bush increasingly used pejorative and emotionally laden descriptors such as “evildoer” and “madman” in his references to Saddam Hussein, and he framed Iraq as part of an “axis of evil” along with Iran and North Korea, demonstrating the hostility criterion.


Finally, disproportionality refers to an exaggeration of the objective or realistic threat posed to society. We now know that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and no involvement in 9/11, despite the Bush administration’s claims to the contrary, which together demonstrate disproportionality.

These findings confirm what millions of Americans have imagined for some time: The deceptions by the Bush administration actually worked! It is reasonable to conclude from these results that the war in Iraq was legitimized by a moral panic engineered by the Bush administration and fueled by the news media, based on distorted and misleading rhetoric regarding an imminent (but non-existent) threat posed by the regime of Saddam Hussein.


Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Bonn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Scott Bonn has a Ph.D. in Sociology and is an Assistant Professor at Drew University.  He is a writer. as well as a social and political commentator.  He conducts original research on the effects of media and political rhetoric on public (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Bush Administration Deceptions Concerning Iraq Continue

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend