Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Thinking the Unthinkable; opening up negotiations with the Iraqi Resistance

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (# of views)   No comments
Author 33
Message Mike Whitney
Become a Fan
  (45 fans)
The purpose of the Iraqi constitution is to legitimize the American occupation and establish the legal framework for dividing the country. It does nothing for the Iraqi people except exacerbate sectarian and religious animosities. Only a fool would accept a constitution that is designed to break up the nation; that is a contradiction of the basic principle the underscores such documents.

The constitution was rejected by solid majorities in three Sunni provinces even though, according to leaders in the Association of Muslim Scholar, “the Americans fraudulently turned Sunni “no” votes into “yes” votes.” (NY Times)

Mr. Kubaisy, representative of the AMS said, “The constitution was part of an American conspiracy to shred this country into pieces….This constitution will be terminated when they leave.”

Kubaisy’s remarks reflect the sentiments of the vast majority of Sunni’s as well as the 82% of Iraqis who are now “strongly opposed” to the ongoing presence of occupation troops. (Poll by British Government 10-15-05)

The purpose of a constitution is to unify the people under a common commitment to civil liberties, human rights, and the rule of law. All of these are sadly lacking in the Iraqi version which is primarily designed to strengthen the role of religion in government and allow for regional autonomy. The division of Iraq should not be revered as a “constitution”, but partition.

More importantly, the constitution lacks any real credibility because the nation is at war and that conflict poses a direct challenge to the survival of the regime. If representative government requires the consent of the governed, then it naturally follows that massive civil unrest and resistance signal the unwillingness of the people to accept the authority of the government.

The current violence in Iraq suggests widespread rejection of the American puppet-state. This cannot be resolved by edicts from Washington, but by political dialogue with the warring parties; negotiations with the resistance.

Currently, the Bush administration is working behind the scenes to form a bogus-Sunni organization called the Iraqi Concord Front (ICF) which pretends to represent the political interests of Sunnis. The group will field candidates for the December elections for the National Assembly and work to disrupt the objectives of the Iraqi resistance. Already, one of the group’s leaders’, Alla Makki, has stated that he will try to convince resistance fighters to lay down their weapons and join the political process.

“The political process”?

The political process will only begin when the Bush administration sits down with members of the Iraqi resistance and negotiates a settlement to the dispute. As of now there is no dialogue and, therefore, no political process.

Eventually, the administration will see that Iraq cannot be subjugated by jackboot tactics and imperial exploitation. Regardless of Washington’s penchant for the cruel and inhuman treatment of its prisoners, or its insatiable craving for Falluja-type retribution; the logistics do not favor success. Pipelines to the North have been sabotaged again, stopping the flow of oil for an estimated 3 weeks. The battle to disrupt crucial oil supplies will eventually force negotiations. Although the lives of innocent Iraqis have never mattered to the White House cabal, oil certainly has. The world’s tenuous economic situation will dictate policy, and within two years, members of the Bush administration will be joined at the bargaining table with members of Iraq’s disparate resistance.

The administration could do us all a favor by anticipating the inevitable failure of their misguided crusade and calling for a total and immediate ceasefire, followed by negotiations with representatives of the Iraqi resistance, and an unconditional commitment to withdraw all foreign troops.

The issues of reparations, reconstruction and war crimes can be dealt with at some mutually agreed upon future date, but for now, let’s stop the killing.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Mike Whitney Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Mike is a freelance writer living in Washington state.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Class Warfare Scoreboard -- Guess Who's Winning?

Newt's Victory: Was it a "Surge" of popularity or faulty voting machines?

Is Fukushima's Doomsday Machine About to Blow?

Troublemaking Washington: Pushing Ukraine to the Brink

The Broken Chessboard: Brzezinski Gives Up on Empire

Dominique Strauss-Kahn was trying to torpedo the dollar

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: