Listen to some Stones while you're reading this, to set the mood.
The British "telly programme" BBC Newsnight recently featured filmmaker Shane O'Sullivan's claim that he has discovered new video and photographic evidence that puts three senior CIA operatives at the scene of Robert Kennedy's assassination in the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5th, 1968.
These three agents were on assignment in Southeast Asia at the time and had no official business being stuck around a Kennedy campaign rally where security was provided by the Secret Service and the L.A.P.D:
I'm most certainly not saying every cop is a criminal, but the new evidence in the story is certainly worthy of notice. Convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan, who is still in prison nearly four decades later, consistently claims no memory of the events of that night, and was apprehended in his position directly in front of Bobby seconds after multiple bullets mortally pierced Presidential candidate Kennedy as friends, associates and supporters screamed in vain.
The coroners report indicates however that this Kennedy died of a gunshot wound to the back of his head from below and to his right - as if fired upward from the hip of someone behind him. One bullet struck him in the skull and sealed his fate.
Perhaps I am in need of restraint, but Sirhan's psychologists and others suspect that a "Psychological Warfare" technique of chemically enhanced hypnosis may have been utilized to induce an obedient trance in order for Sirhan to serve as a decoy and a stooge for the actual killers.
The three men positively identified as senior officers who worked together in 1963 at JMWAVE, the CIA's Miami base for its "Secret War on Castro" are Chief of Operations David Morales, Chief of Maritime Operations Gordon Campbell and Chief of Psychological Warfare Operations George Joannides. Pleased to meet you.
I encourage everyone to watch the video directly from the BBC source above because it raises even more unanswered questions than were already readily known. That isn't what's puzzling me though.
An extremely rough edit left a major portion of the original BBC film missing on the version posted on Google Video. Starting at the 4:54 mark, there is 2:24 that appears to have been removed. Whoever did so stole many a man's ability to weigh the evidence for themselves:
It is during this missing section in the original BBC video that the identities of Morales and Campbell appear to be conclusively confirmed. It also contains testimony that both men hated the Kennedys dating to the Bay of Pigs incident. Most damning, however, is direct testimony from the former attorney for the now-deceased Morales, Robert Walton, saying that Morales admitted to him that he saw it was time for a change and that "I was in Dallas when we got the son of a b*tch and I was in Los Angeles when we got the little bastard."
It is my understanding that you and me can upload a video clip onto Google Video, so it is difficult to discern who didn't want that particular section to be kept from truth-seeking eyes and ears.
Google owners and men of wealth and taste Sergei Brin and Larry Page have recently been said to have stated that "the company won't abandon its free and open search engines despite any potential pressure from shareholders" according to Everything Google, and I would like to trust that their service doesn't censor or alter its submissions in sympathy for guilty devil s.
I am sure the nature of what's confusing you, however, isn't that the efforts to suppress the truth about the ongoing attack on progressive, populist ideas and their proponents aren't limited to simply calling Patriotic Truth Tellers and Heroic Whistle Blowers "Conspiracy Theorists", "Loonies", "Moonbats" and wearers of tin foil hats.
It's the nature of their game to have no sympathy. For you however, if you do not insist that the truth be allowed to be told, I tell you one time, baby, you're to blame.
As seen on http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/