How stupid does little Bush think we are?
The answer is: pretty damned stupid.
That’s the only conclusion possible after hearing him try to claim that the winding down of his “surge” escalation of 30,000 additional troops represents a “new” strategy of reducing American troops in Iraq.
They have to be brought home!
And yet, here is Bush saying that because the “surge” is working (sic), he can start bringing the first soldiers home for Christmas (nice touch that). And here’s the corporate media, at least in its “objective” news reports, quoting him without the slightest hint of irony.
Congressional Democrats should be saying the same thing to Bush: No more money for Iraq.
But they won’t.
They just want a bigger drawdown of troops, so they can pretend they’re doing something about the ongoing disaster in Iraq.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid whines that the Democratic majority is so small it is nonexistent. With Sen. Joe Lieberman voting with the Republicans, he pleads, he really only has 49 votes, so what can he do? The answer of course, is that he can filibuster any funding bills, and kill them with just 41 votes.
The Republicans know how to filibuster.
And besides, the Democrats in the House have a more solid majority. They should be able to block additional funding for the war easily, by just not letting any such bill pass. Instead of threatening junior House members and committee chairs with punishment if they support impeachment, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should be using her disciplinary power to make Blue Dog democrats toe the line and oppose further funding of the war—something she has been strangely unwilling to do. How about “war funding is off the table” Nancy?
In Bush’s case, I think it’s clear that he really doesn’t care what we think. All he wants is to keep his war going through the next 16 months, until he can hand it over to the next president. And thanks to the wimps now running Congress, he appears likely to be able to do that.