Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Democratic Party Funds Pro Bush Iraq War Supporter; Turns it's Back on Vote Rigging Scandal Whistleblower!

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments

 Yes it's true. Apparently the DCCC has decided that it would prefer not to put it's money behind the usual rhetoric of the Nouveau Parti démocratique . Instead of standing behind all of the talk about a new direction for America and real election reform, the DCCC and party insiders are putting the purse behind Fla. 24th millionaire former FL legislator Suzanne Kosmas, who cosponsored legislation praising President Bush for invading a sovereign country. It was FL House Resolution HR 9033, and it can be found right HERE. The "Resolution in Support of President Bush." 

There's much more to release from Kosmas' voting record. But for now, just ask yourself -- is a millionaire corporate pro-war Democrat like Kosmas what FL-24 needs? Or do we need real leadership that represents THE PEOPLE for a change? 

I'm  for leadership that represents we the people!!! That's why I'm putting my money behind Clint Curtis. The problem is he's running out of time! 

For those of you who aren't familiar with the the “Tom Feeney Clint Curtis Vote Rigging Scandaland the murder of Raymond Lemme" I urge you to "google it". You can also visit Brad Blog to learn more about this incredible software programmer, vote-rigging whistleblower turned Congressional Candidate (FL-24), Also please see his full video testimony before the House Judiciary Committee 

Clint is running for congress AGAINST THE VERY PERSON WHO ASKED HIM TO "RIG THE VOTE." Unfortunately if he can't come up with $5,000.00 by the end of April 2008  he won't be able to get on the ballot and in fact will be forced to withdraw!

Why would the DCCC decide to fund another millionare status quo insider instead of funding a candidate who has already proven that he beat Feeney once when he ran against him in 2006. Clint collected affidavits from voters to establish a paper record of the vote and used these as evidence in his filing of a challenge of the official results The House Administration Committee however, chose not to accept Clint's voter affidavits as evidence that the official tallies were 12-24 percent off which would have unseated Feeney. 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Tiffane C Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

If you want to learn more about hidden food sensitivities and The in home test; The Allertest visit (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Could Hidden Food Allergies Be Causing Your Migraines?

Sworn Affidavits Signed By Voters Aren't Evidence???

USS Constellation Turns Her Stern To The Boston Tea Party

Democratic Party Funds Pro Bush Iraq War Supporter; Turns it's Back on Vote Rigging Scandal Whistleblower!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend