Yes it's true. Apparently the DCCC has decided that it would prefer not to put it's money behind the usual rhetoric of the Nouveau Parti démocratique . Instead of standing behind all of the talk about a new direction for America and real election reform, the DCCC and party insiders are putting the purse behind Fla. 24th millionaire former FL legislator Suzanne Kosmas, who cosponsored legislation praising President Bush for invading a sovereign country. It was FL House Resolution HR 9033, and it can be found right HERE. The "Resolution in Support of President Bush."
There's much more to release from Kosmas' voting record. But for now, just ask yourself -- is a millionaire corporate pro-war Democrat like Kosmas what FL-24 needs? Or do we need real leadership that represents THE PEOPLE for a change?
I'm for leadership that represents we the people!!! That's why I'm putting my money behind Clint Curtis. The problem is he's running out of time!
For those of you who aren't familiar with the the “Tom Feeney Clint Curtis Vote Rigging Scandaland the murder of Raymond Lemme" I urge you to "google it". You can also visit Brad Blog to learn more about this incredible software programmer, vote-rigging whistleblower turned Congressional Candidate (FL-24), Also please see his full video testimony before the House Judiciary Committee http://bradblogtoo.blogspot.com/2004/12/video-online-of-clint-curtis-testimony.html.
Clint is running for congress AGAINST THE VERY PERSON WHO ASKED HIM TO "RIG THE VOTE." Unfortunately if he can't come up with $5,000.00 by the end of April 2008 he won't be able to get on the ballot and in fact will be forced to withdraw!
Why would the DCCC decide to fund another millionare status quo insider instead of funding a candidate who has already proven that he beat Feeney once when he ran against him in 2006. Clint collected affidavits from voters to establish a paper record of the vote and used these as evidence in his filing of a challenge of the official results The House Administration Committee however, chose not to accept Clint's voter affidavits as evidence that the official tallies were 12-24 percent off which would have unseated Feeney.