Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
General News

Move Review: Charlie Wilson's War--

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   7 comments, In Series: Reviews: Books, Movies

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (303 fans)
- Advertisement -
Charlie Wilson's War

This is a disturbing and in some ways confusing movie.

It features two of my longtime favorite actors-- Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts, plus a newer taste I've developed, Philip Seymour Hoffman.

Hanks and Hoffman are excellent. Roberts does what she can with a lesser role than I'm accustomed to seeing her play.

- Advertisement -
The movie, as entertainment, does it's job. It's a well put together story, directed by Mike Nichols, with screenplay by Aaron Sorkin of West Wing TV series show fame.

But let's cut to the movie. This is a story about a congressman, recruited and persuaded by a wealthy Texas woman, to covertly fund a huge, massive war.

The enemy is communist Russia. That makes it easy to get the viewer to support the mission. Hanks and Hoffman talk about wanting to kill Russians. We're talking about the late eighties-- near the end of the cold war.

- Advertisement -
I guess some would give the Russian loss in Afghanistan, or from the movie's perspective, Charlie Wilson's defeat of the Russians, as a major factor in the end of the cold war and the beginning of glasnost. I don't buy it.

Any way you slice it, it is disturbing to think that a single member of congress could wangle together the resources to fund a war, just working with committee members on several committees, without the congress approving it.

Of course, this is not surprising. We've seen this before. Remember Iran Contra? Actually, the CIA is an old hand at this kind of business. Who knows how many times, in how many countries, the CIA has funnelled, covertly, weapons and resources to rebels, often supporters of fascists and dictators?

What makes the movie kind of strange is that you want to root for Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts. But Julia plays a right wing religious zealot, trying to and succeeding at making a war happen. Hanks plays a hard drinking, womanizing liberal who is owed more favors than any other member of the house of representatives. And he's working with Republicans to massively fund a war that has not been authorized. This is criminal, maybe treasonous stuff-- the kind of stuff that Dick Cheneyand Ollie North  love to get involved with. No. I do not want to root for a congressman who's trying to raise a billion in funding for a war that is not authorized. That's crazy, even if there are victims of the soviet bad guys. You don't operate a government that way.

The fact that the movie reports that Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan all played a role in the scam, the covert operation, makes this all the more objectionable.

The movie ends with a story I've heard a number of times before that presages unintended consequences-- that it is not always wise to be sad or happy when an event occurs, because you never know what will happen next. We DO know, that after we funded the mujaheddin in Afghanistan to defeat the Russians, that set things up to allow the Taliban to take over and they invited Al Qaeda into the country. Talk about unintended consequences and what a brilliant job Charlie Wilson, in the end, with his wealth Texas female collaborator, did. Stupid, stupid. Oh, and did I mention stupid? Sounds like something Bush and his appointees would do. Oh. Wait. Herbert Walker was VP, still with deep connections to the CIA. Well, Duh!

- Advertisement -
What's good about this flick is it lays out just how easy it can be for this kind of crap to happen in congress. One thing we should not do is take it for granted. We need to pass laws and set policies so this kind of stuff does not happen anymore.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites,

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver