Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 34 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 11/21/21

Why Bill Shatner had to go to Space

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   6 comments
Message Jonathan Dickau
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

'The Most Profound Experience': William Shatner Speaks After Blue Origin Spaceflight After successfully reaching the edge of space, actor William Shatner thanked Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos for giving him .the most profound experience. and ...
(Image by YouTube, Channel: NBC News)
  Details   DMCA

I applaud the fact that Jeff Bezos gave William Shatner the opportunity to get a new perspective on the world, from the rim of space. But quite a few influential people made disparaging remarks about the wastefulness and hubris to make that happen. Perhaps the strongest criticism has been that it is just another example of how we are despoiling the planet while ignoring the need to devote such resources to save the Earth. One of the most eloquent expressions of that mindset happened years ago, in the voice of Pete Seeger at the close of the Smothers Brothers TV show, when he sang "Here we are, knee deep in garbage, firing rockets at the moon." That stunt almost resulted in the show being cancelled; it caused such a furor among the producers and sponsors. We were in the middle of the Apollo program at the time, and it was thought unpatriotic to disrespect NASA. But when I got to talk with Pete years later; he told me he lamented the decision to perform that song, after he learned just how much good our space exploration efforts were doing to save the Earth. Then he told me a story about his Dad, Charles (on pg. 283 of "Where Have all the Flowers Gone?"), who late in life became very anti-Science and actively worked to get scientists to see reason, and to understand that they were fueling the warlike aims of dictators and despots. Pete was more philosophical, waxing on the idea that yesterday's answers won't solve the problems of today, and saying he would take his father to task - citing Kant and Hegel who talked about the need for a synthesis emerging from the clash of opposing views.

Humanity needs such philosophical insights to survive. I had the extraordinary privilege to be part of a discussion with some of the world's top scientists and philosophers (HR3 - Time and Philosophy in Physics) during the 16th Marcel Grossmann conference this past July. I cite a 2018 paper (Found. Phys. 28, 5) by lead-off speaker Carlo Rovelli which asserts that Physics needs Philosophy, and vice versa, for either to give us meaningful insights about reality. He talks about the ancient debate between the schools of Isocrates and Plato which rages to this day. While Isocrates taught that it is most important to cultivate skills of a practical nature, and the mastery thereof; Plato thought we should seek to learn how things work and how they came to be, as a more general pursuit of pure knowledge. These opposing philosophies greatly influence our politics and how we view the advance of human knowledge. But it is also easy to see that such debates often center on views of time, where liberals are more forward-facing being concerned with creating a better future, while conservatives tend to be more concerned with preserving the legacy and traditions that brought us to where we are today. The biggest problem I see is that people are hung up on proving that one view or the other is the best or correct ideology.

It is abundantly evident that both views are needed and that each philosophical ideal informs us in ways the other cannot. But few among us are visionary enough to gaze from outside the clash of ideologies that separates us. So we need more Pete Seegers and more Carlo Rovellis, as well as a healthy number of people like Gene Roddenberry, who can look past the divisive elements to envision a future where Science has prevailed and people have finally learned to get along. So how does one get the view from the outside? You rise above! So it seems that the one best way to get that inspiration is going into space. From all reports; it is so profoundly and lastingly awe-inspiring that nothing else compares. Of course; it is now a costly and wasteful procedure, to bring folks to the rim of space as tourists. But only by taking steps toward making it practical and cost effective will we one day look back and ask why we waited so long. While it will always be difficult to travel in space and arrive back home safely; it need not remain the province of a few millionaires or celebrities if we keep going. However; we need a philosophical shift to see how the clash between an idea and its opposite can result in something with the best of both worlds, where the synthesis or fusion of two opposing views of Philosophy creates a new view of reality. The ancient Greeks talked about virtue this way, as the pediment or apex poised between opposites, where too little or too much of a given quality is a bad thing. Thus courage is the balance between timidity and boldness. We need a balance of views like that now more than ever.

So I'd like to speak up on behalf of William Shatner, Jeff Bezos, and others who have a visionary ideal similar to what Gene Roddenberry promoted with "Star Trek," that we can have a brighter future on Earth if we explore space. I do not think it is frivolous to imagine that we need to give as many influential people as possible that incomparably inspiring view from the rim of space, so they can share the sense of awe and wonder that can make an aging adult feel like a child again. But for those who feel otherwise; I think that for scientists and others to keep going into space is likely the best way to heal the climate and save planet Earth. Of course; one can argue that all kinds of observation can take place by satellites, which don't require a human presence. Likewise for going to Mars and other planets; the robots will have an easier time surviving than humans, and can send back tons of data. However; we are born explorers and there is nothing like exploring new realms for yourself. In fact; that is what scientific discovery is all about "to boldly go where no one has gone before" or as Nobel laureate Doug Osheroff puts it to "search unexplored regions of the parameter space," because that is how advancements in Science are made.

If we fail to advance; it is possible that humanity will find ourselves without a home all too soon. So we need to gain perspective. If we are mired in conflicting views and appear to be hemmed in; it is because we lack perspective. People climb mountains and build or inhabit skyscrapers to rise above the norm and change their outlook on the world. Going into space is just another step in that direction. When we stop taking steps to advance progress is when our real problems begin. Therefore; it is shortsighted or wishful thinking that asserts it would be better to forget about space tourism and human spaceflight in general, until we have solved our Earth-side problems. There is a kind of hubris to that way of thinking which does a disservice to the spirit of innovation which might cure the challenges we face. So I see the brief voyage of William Shatner as a good thing, in terms of extending and expanding the possibilities for inspiration. I advocate looking from an elevated and inclusive view which is not afraid to explore. This ideal sees manned space flight as a good thing overall, because it tends to inspire a more open-minded and encompassing view of the world. But all too often; people encounter a kind of fierce pressure that we should stay home on the 'island of the familiar' as with the title character in Disney's "Moana," because everything we need is right here on this beautiful island - so there is no need to explore. However; our beautiful island Earth is sick, and in order to heal it human beings may need to go off exploring just like the girl in that story.

 2021 Jonathan J. Dickau - all rights reserved

Rate It | View Ratings

Jonathan Dickau Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jonathan is a modern Renaissance man. He is a Grammy award-winning engineer, a performer, a writer and lecturer, and a scientific researcher. Since recording "At 89" Jonathan has worked on other projects with Pete Seeger, including a 300 song (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fundamental Physics may be Our Best Hope

Innovation and Progress

What Do Adults Do?

We must change how we talk about Climate issues to create the climate for a Green New Deal

Make Progress Now!

Cornered Animals

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend