Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/14/10

Waterboarding and Rendition? Old Hat for CIA Global Police State

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   7 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 27454
Message Bill Hare

Shock resounded through America when it was learned that waterboarding and rendition were among the international crimes being conducted on the pretext of fighting the war on terror.

The 9/11 tragedies had been used in addition to generating the Iraq War to justify virtually any action, no matter how contrary to the U.S. Constitution and international law.

The government run by executive office signing statements engaged in preventive detention, electronic surveillance and dropping into residences when the occupants are out, all without court orders.

There was even the removal of materials to be later used as evidence without legal remedy based on these home invasions, the same province that was supposed to be a citizen's castle.

In addition, there was rummaging through library records of private citizens once again without a court order signed by a magistrate.

Veteran Washington journalist Seymour Hersh, a muckraker in the best tradition of I.F. Stone, sparked a firestorm when he revealed the kind of egregious violations of international law being conducted abroad in the "spirit of 9/11" through waterboarding and rendition.

The CIA was created by the National Security Act of 1947. The reason stated by President Harry Truman for creating it was to have a separate agency available to engage in intelligence activity. The genie was out of the bottle and an international calamity was unleashed under the guise of protecting U.S. national security.

The pretext used by agency operatives to operate willy-nilly in America's presumed interest was one snippet of language in the National Security Act's defining document that the CIA could "perform such other functions and duties " as the National Security Council may from time to time direct."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Bill Hare Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: