Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/2/19

WIll Shake Up at IAEA Impact Iran?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
- Advertisement -

Republished from NEO

Yukiya Amano
Yukiya Amano
(Image by IAEA)
  Details   DMCA

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Yukiya Amano's passing has stirred up suspicion and further tensions amid US-Iranian tensions.

- Advertisement -

Amano was 72 years old and as of mid July 2019 had already begun preparing to step down due to poor health.

A July 18 AFP-JIJI article titled, "Japanese IAEA head Yukiya Amano to step down next year for health reasons: diplomatic sources," reported:

The head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, Yukiya Amano, will step down in March for health reasons, diplomatic sources said Wednesday, as the agency navigates verification of the increasingly fragile Iran nuclear deal.

- Advertisement -

However, in the wake of his death and because of his perceived opposition to US efforts to undermine the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) or "Iran Deal" suspicions began circulating that the US or Israel or both may have played a role in his death.

Iran-based Tasnim News Agency in an article titled, "Sources Raise Possibility of Israeli Assassination of Amano," would claim:

Informed sources have speculated that late chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Yukiya Amano was assassinated by Israel in collaboration with the US for refusing to give in to pressures to raise new fabricated allegations against Iran's nuclear program.

Considering the foreign policy track records of either the US or Israel an assassination targeting members of international institutions impeding Western interests certainly sounds plausible. However no evidence has been provided to suggest Amano was assassinated.

Furthermore his death whatever the cause will likely have little impact on the IAEA's policies or the general state of US-Iranian tensions for several reasons.

International Institutions are the Sum of their Member States

- Advertisement -

International institutions reflect the vector sum of sponsoring nations' interests. As the global balance of power shifts, so too does the proportion of influence of each member state represented by these institutions. In turn the agenda of these institutions changes accordingly.

The IAEA's criticism of Washington's undermining of the Iran Deal reflects not the IAEA's independent assessment but the collective interests of member nations the IAEA supposedly represents in all matters of nuclear technology. It is no coincidence that in the halls of foreign ministries around the globe similar criticism has been leveled against Washington regarding the Iran Deal.

Nations in Europe attempting to salvage the deal have taken measures to sidestep US sanctions imposed after the US unilaterally and without justification, withdrew. Whatever influence these same nations have within the UN and IAEA has certainly filtered through and was reflected by Amano's position over the Iran Deal prior to his death.

With this in mind, one can expect the IAEA's position to remain relatively unchanged regardless of who becomes the institution's next chief.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Tony Cartalucci Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine "New Eastern Outlook".



Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why the West Won't Hit ISIS Where it Hurts

US Puppet Wants Help Making Thailand Like America

Opposition or Terrorists: Who is Syria and Russia Bombing in Idlib?

Destabilizing Pakistan: Bookending Washington's China Policy

WIll Shake Up at IAEA Impact Iran?

US-backed Opposition Prime Suspects in Thai Bombings

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


Mohammad Ala

Become a Fan
Author 8028

(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 9 fans, 20 articles, 27 quicklinks, 835 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

IAEA and NPT were created by world nuclear powers to control other countries especially those which do not have nuclear arms.

Mr. Amano was hand-picked because he supported Western views. Another head will be chosen who have sympathy for Western illegal views.

The role of force has replace the rule of law. The majority of the UN countries have no backbone to stand up and voice their opinions freely including countries such as Sweden and Denmark. I have mentioned their UN voting records do not match their criticism of world affairs. These countries have no right to criticize when they are puppets of P 5 + 1 countries. For further information, please see my article.

The Joint Nuclear Agreement which was forced on Iran in 2015 is illegal and discriminates a member country of IAEA and NPT by giving it fewer rights. What a farce!

There are countries that have nuclear arsenal but IAEA does not dare to condemn them.

Rule of Jungle is used in international relations.


Submitted on Saturday, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:13:03 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

nelswight

Become a Fan
Author 2581

(Member since Sep 3, 2006), 365 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Mohammad Ala:   New Content


You are most aware, Khaleh.

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:51:49 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment