Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/17/20

Trump Wants to Inflict Severe Pain on Disabled Community Just Because He Can

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   No comments
Author 2529
Message Dean Baker
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

From Truthout

Cruel Donald Trump
Cruel Donald Trump
(Image by YouTube, Channel: The Telegraph)
  Details   DMCA

The "need" to strip benefits from poor and working people to help maintain the lifestyles of the Mar-a-Lago set is one of the fundamental principles of Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The rich always "need" more tax cuts, so when budget deficits get in the way, those at the middle and bottom are just going to have to sacrifice.

This is the reasoning behind the large budget cuts that the president has proposed for Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps in his most recent budget proposal.

However, the rule changes and proposed cuts to the disability programs that Trump is now pushing will actually provide little room for future tax cuts for his rich friends. The cost of the additional bureaucracy needed to administer these changes is projected to eat up most of the savings from lower benefits. This means Trump wants to inflict considerable pain on the disabled community just because he can.

The basic story is that Trump is proposing to require that people receiving government disability payments have their status reviewed with greater frequency. He is also proposing raising the standards to qualify for disability. This will lead to fewer people collecting benefits.

By the administration's own projections, these changes will save $2.6 billion in benefit payments over the next decade. The changes will lead to 2.6 million additional reviews over this period, costing the government $1.8 billion.

This leads to a net projected savings of $0.8 billion over the decade, or $80 million a year. That comes to less than 0.002 percent of projected federal spending. It is not too much more than what taxpayers spend each year on Trump's golfing vacations. So, we are not talking about real savings in terms of the federal budget.

However, the additional reviews and the risk of being wrongly deprived of benefits are a big deal to the disabled people who will confront them. Before getting into more detail, there are two important points to be made about the benefits at stake.

First, benefits are not especially generous now. The average Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefit is less than $1,300 a month. The average Supplemental Security Income benefit (SSI) is less than $700 a month.

SSI benefits are income-based. Only low-income families are eligible. However, benefits paid out through SSDI, by far the larger of the two programs, are based on a person's work history. These benefits are insurance that workers have paid for through a 2.4 percent payroll tax. Their benefits depend on their past earnings.

This is an important point. Denying disability benefits to people who have earned them is like an insurer denying the claim of someone whose house has burned down. It is effectively breaking a contract, the one area of business where everyone agrees that Trump excels.

To see concretely what Trump's proposed changes will mean, imagine a 60-year-old truck driver or autoworker who badly hurt their back on the job. This person likely will not be able to work any longer at the physically demanding job they previously held. However, they may not be totally disabled.

It is possible they could work at a less demanding job with much lower pay, for example, working part-time in a convenience store. It is not clear whether this person would have gotten disability under the current rules. They would be considerably less likely under the Trump rules.

In addition to the disability not being totally debilitating, Trump's rules would also not take age into account. Previously, the claim of this 60-year-old would be treated somewhat more leniently than a 40-year-old in the same condition.

There are two reasons for considering age in determining disability. First, people's health generally gets worse as they age. If someone is marginally disabled at age 60, they are likely to be in worse condition at age 61.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Dean Baker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dr. Dean Baker is a macroeconomist and Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Federal Reserve Board and the Presidential Candidates

The Deficit Hawks Target Nurses and Firefighters

The Attack of the Real Black Helicopter Gang: The IMF Is Coming for Your Social Security

The profit on the TARP and Bernie Madoff

Poverty: The New Growth Industry in America

The Real Reason For The Government Shutdown

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: