Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 38 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 10/18/19

The mid-September liquidity crisis

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Jean-Luc Basle

On September 17, the repo rate more than doubled from the previous day, jumping from 2.42% to 5.25%. (1) Strangely, the effective fed fund rate and the Libor rate which move in unison with the repo rate, remained virtually unchanged that day. Surprised and concerned that a liquidity crisis was in the making, the Federal Reserve injected $53 billion into the repo market and another $75 billion the following day. But, how could there be a liquidity crisis when the fed fund and Libor market rates stayed stable and banks have $1.305 billion of excess reserves? Excess reserves are funds banks keep at the Federal Reserve beyond and above the required reserves they are expected to maintain to respond to liquidity crises. (2)

There was no crisis. So, what was the repo market hick-up all about? Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, gives the answer in an interview . The target is the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. Banks want it to be relaxed. So, they refrained from intervening in the repo market, creating a temporary shortage of liquidity. After their recent victory on the Volcker Rule (3), banks believed they may score another big win this time on the liquidity front. So far to no avail. The Federal Reserve is not falling for it. But with a President who is very much against regulations, there are grounds for optimism.

Wouldn't a relaxation of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio increase the intensity of the next financial crisis? Of course, it would. But this is no concern of the likes of Jamie Dimon. His bank and a few others are considered too big to fail this means they will be bailed out by the authorities, if necessary. So, when the next crisis strikes, he, his bank and his shareholders will come out unscathed, as in September 2008. Why worry? The tab will be picked up by Federal authorities, i.e. by the average American.

(1) "Repo" or "repurchase agreement": short-term loans (mostly overnight), secured by government securities.

(2) Banks had no excess reserves in September 2008.

(3) The Volcker Rule restricts banks' ability to trade for their account with customers' deposits. The rule was relaxed in early September.

Rate It | View Ratings

Jean-Luc Basle Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Former Vice President Citigroup New York (retired) Columbia University -- Business School Princeton University -- Woodrow Wilson School

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Mohammed bin Salman: a useful idiot

Don't poke the Russian bear

Blowback: the making of an anti-US coalition

Origin of Covid-19

Is Russia a threat for the United States? Evidence says no.

The 2016 American Revolution

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend