Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/25/20

The People vs. Mitch McConnell

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   No comments
Author 92139
Message Harold Novikoff
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Constitution We the People.
Constitution We the People.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org), Author: Constitution_Pg1of4_AC.jpg: Constitutional Convention derivative work: Bluszczokrzew (talk))
  Details   Source   DMCA

Amidst all the frenzy of Trump's and Mitch McConnell's stratagem of rushing through the appointment of a Supreme Court justice of their choice before the November 3 election, there is an alternate path that would correct the ethical and legal controversies triggered by their actions. This matter was brought up in previous articles: "High Crime In The U.S.Senate" (OpEd Oct. 10, 2018) and "Public Enemy #2" (OpEd Dec. 23, 2019).

Let's go back to the decision by Mitch McConnell not to allow President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, to be brought up for confirmation by the senate. Obama had a clear constitutional power and duty to appoint a judge to that position, subject to senate approval. The constitution did not grant McConnell the authority to deny that power. The reasons he gave for refusing to allow the nomination to proceed place the senate's internal rules for procedures above the president's powers and duties granted by the constitution. His actions were clearly an obstruction of constitutionally authorized procedure and could be interpreted as a violation of the constitution, at least removing McConnell from his position in the senate, if not putting him in prison for sedition.

It is time to take legal action to rectify this violation of the constitution. The quickest way to settle the case legally would be to acknowledge the breach of constitutional procedure by restoring Merrick Garland to the top position in the queue to be confirmed as Supreme Court justice. Otherwise, under threat of legal action, the matter could be settled ethically by McConnell and other Republican senators honoring their prior pledges to defer Supreme Court confirmation hearings for the next administration - their rationale for blocking Merrick Garland's confirmation.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Harold Novikoff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Veteran, retired from several occupations (school teacher, technical writer, energy conservation business, etc.) long-time Sierra Club member


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wild Fires

The Motive Behind Global-Warming Denial

Is Democracy Obsolete?

Tulsi on Impeachment

High Crime in the U.S. Senate

Dark Matters: The Science/Industrial Complex

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: