Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 25 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 12/3/19

The Pentagon's Destruction of the Bill of Rights

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (# of views)   4 comments
Author 42549
Message Jacob Hornberger
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

From FFF


(Image by Wikimedia, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International)   Details   DMCA

It is supremely ironic that Pentagon officials take an oath to support and defend the Constitution because they intentionally destroyed the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution when they set up their "judicial" system at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In fact, the very reason the Pentagon established its system in Cuba, rather than the United States, was to circumvent and avoid the provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Prior to the 9/11 attacks, whenever someone was charged with terrorism or any other criminal offense, U.S. officials would secure a grand-jury indictment and then prosecute him in a U.S. District Court. The accused in the federal court system is guaranteed certain procedural protections, many of which were carved out during centuries of resistance by British citizens to the tyranny of their own government. Our American ancestors demanded that many of those procedural protections be expressly enshrined in the Bill of Rights so that everyone would know that federal officials would have to abide by them whenever they charged people with federal crimes.

Examples of procedural guarantees include no cruel and unusual punishments, the right to confront adverse witnesses, the right to counsel, the right to due process of law, the right of trial by jury, the right to be presumed innocent, the right to remain silent, the right of speedy trial, the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, the right to be free of coerced confessions, and the right to counsel.

After 9/11, the Pentagon established its own "judicial" system at Gitmo to try terrorism cases, as an alternative to the federal judicial system in the United States. Yet, one searches in vain for any authority in the Constitution for the Pentagon to do that. When one reads the Constitution, the intent of the Framers is clear: one judicial system, the federal system for trying all cases involving the commission of federal offenses.

Contrary to what some people maintain, terrorism is not an act of war. It is a federal criminal offense. That's why it's listed in the U.S. Code, which enumerates federal criminal offenses. It's also why terrorism cases have long been tried in federal district court. It's also why the Pentagon is prosecuting terrorism defendants in its "judicial" system in Cuba.

The establishment of the Pentagon's system now enables federal officials the option of sending people who are accused of terrorism into two different systems, one run by the federal courts and the other run by the Pentagon. Thus, if two different people are charged with participating in the same terrorism offense, one can be sent into the federal court system and the other can be sent into the Pentagon's system.

The choice makes all the difference in the world to people who are accused of terrorism because the two systems are total opposites. The Pentagon's system has destroyed the procedural guarantees that the federal court system still protects. There is no trial by jury in the Pentagon's system; trial is by military tribunal. Torture and other cruel and unusual punishments are meted out in the Pentagon's system, oftentimes before conviction. Confessions can be coerced and are admissible into evidence. Hearsay evidence is admissible, which nullifies the right to confront adverse witnesses. Defendants are presumed guilty and treated accordingly. There is no right of speedy trial; some people have languished in the Pentagon's system for more than a decade without trial.

In the beginning, the Pentagon wasn't even going to allow its prisoners to have lawyers, but the Supreme Court put the quietus to that plan by ordering otherwise. Even then, the Pentagon has secretly monitored communications between attorney and client, a severe violation of the attorney-client privilege that is sacred in the federal court system.

Again, this was all by design. The U.S. military has long been a conservative organization, and conservatives have long poo-pooed the procedural protections in the Bill of Rights as nothing more than ludicrous constitutional "technicalities" intended to let guilty people go free. After 9/11, the Pentagon decided that it was going to show how an ideal "judicial" system would operate, one in which such constitutional "technicalities" could be ignored.

In the process, America ended up adopting a "judicial" system that is very similar to those in totalitarian regimes. After more than 200 years of Bill of Rights protection, the fear generated by the 9/11 attacks enabled the Pentagon to figure how a way to successfully circumvent those protections. In the name of keeping us "safe" from "the terrorists," the result has been a destruction of critically important parts of the Bill of Rights.

 

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Jacob Hornberger Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Won't The CIA Release Its Joannides Files?

Brent Taylor Did Not Die For God, Family, And Country

Russia: Friend or Foe?

Trump's Self-Painted Corner on Iran

Two More U.S. Deaths for Nothing in Afghanistan

Jury Nullification Thwarts Immigration Tyranny

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments  Post Comment


Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
Author 24101
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 15 fans, 6 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2112 comments (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

At the present time, it is silly to think that any part of the Constitution receives any respect in American law. We live in a fascist oligarchy, not a nation of laws.

Submitted on Wednesday, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:50:27 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Help

Lance Ciepiela

Become a Fan
Author 14196
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Apr 4, 2008), 53 fans, 58 articles, 151 quicklinks, 4672 comments, 214 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Of course, 'after 9/11', 'the American people came under nearly immediate suspicion' by the security apparatus of the United States when a revengeful, eager to strike anyone congress quickly passed and a quick to attack Iraq W Bush quickly signed the Patriot Act - an impulsive bill eviscerating America's Civil Liberties. Except that '9/11 never forget' - that it is "beyond any doubt" that explosives - not plane impacts and fires alone - destroyed the three World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001 - #PrePlantedExplosives 'used' on 9/11.

Submitted on Thursday, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:11:36 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (3+)
Help

Richard Pietrasz

Become a Fan
Author 6357
(Member since Jun 7, 2007), 13 fans, 1 quicklinks, 2921 comments, 1 diaries (View Extended Stats)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It is not only the US military that has destroyed the Bill of Rights, but the Supreme Court almost from the beginning. And, the Justice Department has long been dedicated to paying only lip service to the Bill of Rights.

Submitted on Friday, Dec 6, 2019 at 6:49:46 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

Tom Calarco

Become a Fan
Author 506489
(Member since Aug 29, 2016), 39 comments (View Extended Stats)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

LOL ... "the fear generated by the 9/11 attacks enabled the Pentagon to figure how a way to successfully circumvent those protections" ... fear generated by the 9/11 attacks generated by the Pentagon, you should add.

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:48:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment