"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth
and you should save it for someone you love."
For the past 300 years the entire industrialized world has been slowly but relentlessly migrating toward a world of increased individual liberties and freedoms. The US has been slow to keep up with the rest of the world in the area of sexual freedoms. The US has a plethora of laws controlling our individual personal sexual behaviors. Most of these laws are left over from the 1800's before swimming suits were invented. We take these laws for granted and never stop to think about the reasons we still have them. With the exceptions of rape and child abuse, our laws do not protect anyone from harm. There is no crime if there is no victim. Yet religious groups and others demand that big government control our individual behaviors for no reason other than they want everyone to conform to their particular beliefs of what is unacceptable. For example, unmarried sex is a crime in Idaho, Virginia, South Carolina, and Mississippi. Consenting adults who engage in fornication can be arrested and sent to jail for 6 months. Of course, these laws are mostly ignored but law enforcement can use them as leverage over suspects in other cases.
In 2009, the supreme court of Alabama outlawed the sale of "any device designed primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs" (Ref. 1). This was an effort to target sales of masturbation devices. It is clear that sex laws can be arbitrary without rational purpose. Even though masturbation is practiced by virtually all humans and even by monkeys, the Catholic church regards masturbation as a sin. (Ref. 2) It is rumored that teenage girls and boys confessing their sins of masturbation, provide great prurient entertainment for the priests hearing their confessions.
Sex in general is a more sensitive subject in conservative America than in most modern cultures. Even our everyday language suffers due to sexually repressed, conservative thinking. In the past, we were so embarrassed about everything sexual that we invented phrases to avoid speaking plainly as mature adults. Instead of using adult English words, we use ambiguous phrases like "sleeping with", "making love", "having sex", "private parts" and so on. We do this to avoid using proper but supposedly forbidden words. It seems people have the attitude that if we avoid using the proper specific words, the embarrassing subject does not exist.
We are not so intellectually immature that we must avoid using legitimate adult words such as "mating", "fellatio", "fornicating", "copulating", "penis", "vagina" and so on. But we are still subjected to reading these puritanical anachronistic phrases even in newspapers and serious publications. A TV news anchor actually used the words "private parts" on a news program. Apparently, he considered his viewers to be so sexually repressed that they had to be protected from hearing the actual names of body parts. It is time all media - including Sesame Street - stop thinking we will be shocked and offended at hearing the simple but proper names for body parts.
Why is prostitution a crime? Why is nudity a crime? Why is polygamy a crime? Who are the victims in these crimes? We automatically assume there must be some good reason for these laws because they have deep roots in our culture. But in many cultures, in different countries, and in different times these laws did not exist, and society was no worse off. People went about their daily lives planting turnips, making babies, and arguing over who is going to win the big weekend match. If some girl showed up pregnant, everyone pitched in to help her and did not exile her to a mountain cave. Her friends and family did not stop loving her. Our ideas of sex crimes do not come from the Christian Bible or even from Jesus Christ. They were created mostly by old religious men thousands of years ago.
Prostitution is not a crime in most of Europe (Ref. 3). And it is legal in many countries around the world. It is even legal in the state of Nevada. As long as it involves, consenting adults, there are no victims. There is no reason that natural relations between adults should be illegal. Yet social conservatives insist on continuing these outdated and ineffective laws criminalizing a person's right to earn a living even though no one is harmed in the process. Texas conservatives even passed a law outlawing sex involving robots. (Ref. 4) Maybe Texans wanted to protect the robots from abuse and exploitation.
Unlike violent crimes, opinions on prostitution are far from unanimous. 49% favor legalization while 44% do not. (Ref. 5) The objections to legalizing prostitution are neither consistent nor persuasive. Like so many other issues, it is a matter of personal feelings and opinions.
Forcing prostitution underground contributes to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Under legalized prostitution, sex workers in the USA would be tested for diseases before getting permits. Physical exams of the sex workers are standard requirements in countries with legalized prostitution. Without legal protection, prostitutes usually work in unhealthy environments, are put in jail and labeled as criminals. Today, clients can contract diseases and spread the diseases to other innocent people before they realize they are a carrier. People have died after mating with a partner who did not even know they were carriers of an infectious fatal disease.
We waste billions of dollars trying to enforce unenforceable sex laws. Money that is wasted on law enforcement, on judicial resources, on incarceration, and on administrative costs could be redirected to government projects and services that would benefit everyone such as job training and small business loans. Instead of wasting millions on enforcing archaic sex laws, the government could receive significant tax revenues from sensibly taxed sex businesses.
Millions of women, especially struggling students, feel that getting paid for engaging in sexual activities is an easy way to pay the rent. But they do not want to be arrested for prostitution, so they try to find a sugar daddy. One sugar daddy web site has about 1 million members of which 35% are students. (Ref. 6) There are about 12 women online for every sugar daddy looking for a sugar baby. This big difference means it is a buyer's (i.e., sugar daddy) market. Therefore, it is not as lucrative for the ladies as they have been led to believe. It is hard to make a case against legalizing prostitution, when, in one form or another, it is accepted and practiced by virtually everyone, including good girls and boys from good families.
If conservatives were consistent, they would insist that pornography actors and actresses be arrested for getting paid to perform sex acts on camera. This is exactly what prostitution is, yet one is legal, and the other is not. They "justify" this by claiming the porno prostitute is paid by a third party so that makes it acceptable. The morality aspect is never an issue. Our sex laws serve no rational purpose.
Prudes and Nudes
Conservative thinking has kept sex and sexuality repressed in the United States as if it is some shocking immorality. Social conservatives consider all sexual relations to be immoral with the only acceptable sex being between married couples not of the same gender. Other countries, like Spain, have no laws prohibiting nudity. Nude beaches and resorts are perfectly legal in many countries. There are private nudist resorts in the US, but all public nudity is illegal. Nobody is harmed by a topless matron sitting on a beach blanket, but in the US, she is dragged off to jail. All cities have strict laws prohibiting topless and nude entertainment even though there is no purposeful justification for these laws. Entertainment and media have lists of rules controlling language, visuals, and sexual content of any kind.
Marriage counselors recognize that there are elements of sexual incompatibility in nearly every divorce. Yet, people are too embarrassed to even mention the subject of sexual compatibility prior to the wedding. Many even believe there should be no premarital sex at all, which guarantees there will be divorces due to sexual incompatibility. One example is the couple that got divorced immediately after the honeymoon because the bride was shocked to learn the meaning of the word "fellatio". For a marriage to be long and loving, complete sexual compatibility must be established before the wedding. Yet this is illegal in some states and unacceptable in most religions.
In the past it was common to believe all people should generally be the same. A person who had values or beliefs or behaviors that were different from most people was assumed to have something wrong with them. Gays, blacks, women, Asians, and even Muslims were considered to be different and needed to be treated as suspicious and less trustworthy. Of course, nobody believes such nonsense any longer. In recognition and acceptance of the diversity of individuals, we have removed the old laws that prohibited mixed race marriages and same sex marriages. Religious prohibitions against non-traditional marriages continue as they always have.
However, traditional marriage arrangements are not acceptable to everyone. For various reasons, many men and women reject the idea of marriage in general. They prefer to spend their lives free of any entanglements and complications with others. Life experiences have led many women to enjoy the company of other women more than the company of men. Yet they want to have children and want the security of a permanent marriage. These women are drawn to a polygamist arrangement.
Some men prefer having large families instead of the standard 1.93 children and 1.00 wives. Since 80% of human societies have not been monogamous, and only 27% of primate species (apes, monkeys, humans) are monogamous (Ref. 7), it is quite possible that, left unconstrained by laws, culture, and finances, more men and women would seek large families.
This raises the question of why is polygamy illegal in the US? There is no consistent universal answer to this. Some will say it leads to things that are objectionable but not actually polygamy, such as child brides, coerced women, and unmarried men. Those would certainly be serious concerns if they were integral to polygamy. But they are not. If it were legalized, the same laws would apply to all marriages. The parties must be consenting adults. Divorce would always be available to anyone unhappy with their arrangement. An excess of unmarried men would never occur unless a large percentage of the female population were in polygamist marriages.
There are no rational, logical reasons for these oppressive sex laws. We have had sex laws all our lives, so we never consider why we have them or what purpose they serve. In general, it is the religious groups leading the demand that the Federal Government dictates and controls our individual personal behaviors. There is no reason for big government to control the personal lives of consenting adults. What people do in the privacy of their homes is of no concern to the government. For more information on this topic see the highly acclaimed book "The Liberal Record - How Liberals Changed the World".
1. Alabama Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Masturbation Law Click Here
2. Masturbation is a Sin Click Here
3. Prostitution Is Legal in Europe Click Here
4. Sex Robot Brothel in Houston Click Here
5. Should Prostitution Be Legalized? Click Here
6. College Students Using Sugar Daddies to Pay Off Loan Debt Click Here
7. Pairing Up for Life Is Not A Good Idea Click Here