Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 29 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Send Your Child to a Charter, Sign Away Your Parental Rights?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Carl Petersen
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)

Our school "is permitted to meet with your child without your knowledge of prior consent."

-James W. Salin, GHCHS Governing Board Chair

(Image by Sean MacEntee)
  Details   DMCA

Like a page out of 1984, Granada Hills Charter High School (GHCHS) includes stock language in responses to complaints asserting that "GHCHS values your input", while the actual response shows the direct opposite. In the latest example they ignored my wife's formal complaint about how our parental rights were violated when the school's nursing staff tried to return my daughter to physical education earlier than the doctor had instructed and contrary to what she had specified in a note written to the school, with a response that provided a dissertation on the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and how the school complies with these regulations. A follow-up request for the school to investigate the actual terms of the complaint and correct errors within their findings of fact was met with a response that "my April 4, 2016 response addresses your complaints, so no amended response is being issued."

The school's response does demonstrate how the school actually views parent engagement. In his response, James W. Salin, the school's Governing Board Chair, relied on the GHCHS's Parental Notifications of Searches/Interviews policy to explain why my wife was not informed of a medical decision made by the school. He stated that "while every effort will be made to maintain open and strong communication between the school and home, it may be necessary to administratively search and/or interview a student without notifying a parent or guardian." He further explained that "GHCHS has a right to speak with students without parental permission", that "neither GHCHS's UCP nor General Complaint Procedures require the Executive Director to meet with a complainant", and that there is no requirement for the school's staff to let parents know that there is a formal complaint process since the Parent-Student handbook only states that "GHCHS may provide a complaint form for persons wishing to file a complaint to fill out and file" (emphasis theirs). Most curiously, Salin determined that "there is no corrective action required at this time" despite the fact that my daughter had been refused permission to call her mother when school policy states that "when students request to call their parents during this type of meeting, those requests are generally granted" (emphasis mine). Salin had previously stated that "the school nurses have been informed that students are generally allowed to call home in similar situations", which should have been recognized as a corrective action. Even better would have been to extend this training to all school staff.

The response concludes with a statement that "there is not a right to appeal decisions issued under GHCHS's General Complaint Policy." Legally, this is incorrect as the school's charter is authorized by the LAUSD and the District, which, therefore, has an obligation of oversight over the school. Unfortunately, this is a responsibility that the LAUSD Charter School Division (CSD) continuously refuses to accept, even when a school flagrantly disregards California's education code. As an example, the CSD is allowing GHCHS to bully parents into disregarding their right to opt their children out of high-stakes standardized testing.

The California education code allows students "to be exempted and excused from... taking any and all statewide performance assessments." GHCHS seeks to undermine this choice by stating in their Parent-Student Handbook that students must "fully participate in annual state testing" as part of the eligibility requirements for sports, extra-curricular teams/associations, and campus clubs. I notified both the CSD and LAUSD Board months ago of this violation and was assured by the CSD on December 2, 2015, that "in formal communication with the school [they] have made it clear that GHCHS shall not impermissibly penalize students for parental exercise of the legal right to excuse the student from testing" and they expect "the school to take all steps necessary to ensure it is in legal compliance, including reviewing and revising the school's Parent-Student Handbook and providing notice to parents of the revised policy/practice and revised Parent-Student Handbook." However, when reminded that state testing begins this week and the language had not been fully removed, the CSD would only say that they had "obtained a response from Granada and are vetting it with our legal counsel." Assurances that they "will act in accordance with recommendation of counsel as swiftly as possible" does nothing to protect the rights of parents this year who will be coerced into letting their students take these tests due to fear of retribution.

While charters are privately run, they are also publicly funded. The public, therefore, has a right to expect that parents should not have to sign away their rights in order for their children to attend schools that they have paid for. However, as long as the School Board continues to allow the CSD to abdicate their responsibilities, abuses at GHCHS and other charters will continue to occur.


I am a candidate for the District 2 seat on the LAUSD School Board, founder of Change The LAUSD and member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council. Opinions are my own.

Rate It | View Ratings

Carl Petersen Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Carl Petersen is a parent, an advocate for students with special education needs, an elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council, a member of the LAUSD's CAC, and was a Green Party candidate in LAUSD's District 2 School Board race. During the campaign, the Network for Public Education (NPE) Action endorsed him, and Dr. Diane Ravitch called him a " (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Make it a Headline When Trump Actually Tells the Truth

California Senate Candidate Alison Hartson on Education

Three Headlines That Got Buried Last Week

Bright Shiny Objects: Trump's Real Art is Diverting Attention

If Money Continues to Talk, We're Screwed

Finding Hope in Florida

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend