Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 23 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H3'ed 6/15/19

Reflections on Technology & Culture at my Half-Century Mark

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   2 comments
Author 513617
Message Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -
Republished from macskamoksha.com


(Image by 1969 penny [photo by author])   Details   DMCA

Today-if a document from a hospital in Omaha, Nebraska, is to believed-is my 50th birthday.

Some people say age is just a number. Of course in many ways that's totally true. As far as I've seen, anyway, length of time on this planet has no bearing on intelligence, maturity, creativity, sensitivity or perspicacity. My whole life I have kept company with people across a broad age range and I've known a good many older people who were clueless, puerile and undiscerning and a good many younger ones who were sharp, capable and clear. (I've met nearly no one who could be described as "wise," but then I haven't gotten out of the US much.)

- Advertisement -

Nonetheless, I have remained intrigued about age as it relates to history. So, I value the experiences of people ten to twenty years older than me who have clear memories of the Sixties and early Seventies, and I am interested in the views of those twenty to thirty years younger who never knew the world without the internet.

My grandmother was born in the Nineteen-aughts and died at the end of the Eighties. She grew up with the telephone, phonograph, radio and moving pictures (though silent ones at first) but was already a mother of three when television was popularized and commercial air travel became common. Her last decade saw the rise of video games, cable television, consumer computing and a nascent internet, though I doubt she paid much attention to any of them.

The last twenty years have given us another heaping helping of culture-shifting with mobile computing. Most previous forms of media-books, photography, radio, movies, television, etc.-can now be served from a hand held device. Those experiences that once required being in a particular location are now easily portable. I have an older, hand-me-down smartphone that I use as a music player. I rarely connect it to the internet, but its 32 gig SD card contains an amount of music that, when I was a record-collecting teenager, would have filled dozens of milk crates. I can literally listen to music 24/7 for over two weeks without hearing the same thing twice. This amazes me. Of course, other people have much more impressive devices.

- Advertisement -

All this comes under the general rubric of "Progress." These days, a more popular word is "innovation," but it refers to the same narrative: that invention leads to positive metamorphosis. The concept is far from neutral. It's also not scientific.

Honest scholarship tells another story, illuminating how changes in lifestyle instigated by new technologies can be deleterious. Such an analysis is not new. Lewis Mumford wrote about how novel forms of media and spectacle were stimulating drastic transformation in US culture in his book, Technics and Civilization, which was published in 1934. The culprits at that time? Radio, movies and large sporting events. Mumford also spends some time exploring the origins of the "Progress" myth, and showing how it was introduced at the very same time that quality of life was in decline from horrific effects of the Industrial Revolution: think widespread coal-burning, brutal work conditions (including child labor), over-crowded cities, and cheap mass-manufactured goods. Mumford points out that, when textile manufacturing was taken over by factories and abandoned by handicrafters, people knew that the new product was inferior. Cheaper, monetarily? Yes, but also less durable and less attractive. The "progress" occurring was from better to worse. Was life healthier and happier in squalid urban tenements than it had been in the country village? Of course not. Was the agrarian lifestyle being replaced itself a step down from the days of gathering and hunting? Yes, undoubtedly.

So here is what fascinates me: When societies are transformed by technological change, and worldviews disappear, what is lost?

For example, very few people alive in the US today have clear memories of what life was like before television. From all accounts, it was quite different. I could try to describe it here, but I would only be repeating things I've read or heard. I, personally, have no idea at all, and I never will. So it's not really my place.

But when it comes to, for example, cable television, the internet, or mobile devices I could say something. I remember growing up in the Seventies, where there were five channels on TV: ABC, CBS, NBC and two PBS (one based in Nebraska, the other in Iowa). They went off the air late at night, too. At 3am, there was just static. ("Static": is that a foreign concept to people under a certain age? Screens don't make static anymore, certainly not the blizzards that old cathode ray tubes did.)

The spectrum of viewpoints available to me was mind-numbingly narrow, and just being in Nebraska was a constricting experience. I felt trapped, for sure, but didn't know what I was missing. I vividly recall two cultural phenomena that opened my eyes to exciting new possibilities: The Rocky Horror Picture Show and Prince. For a young person struggling with queer urges and identity, that libertine movie and that liberatory artist inspired experimentation and exploration. Those activities resulted in fun and shame, affection and betrayal, excitement and confusion; but it all helped me grow.

- Advertisement -

These days, the bisexual escapades of Dr. Frank-N-Furter and the androgynous presentation of Prince are pretty tame compared to what else you can find on the internet. And that's a good thing. Puritanism is deadening. Everything between consenting people is okay. I am happy for the young people today that they have awareness of a fuller menu than I did.

But the world has also shrunk. It is more human-centric, less nature-aware. Every moment we spend in front of a screen is a moment stolen from fully experiencing the living reality around us. (Doesn't reading a book do that, too? Yes, but in a qualitatively different way, and I know this because I remember.) My childhood was still one dominated by playing outside: running on the grass, digging in the sandbox, climbing over fences, making forts in haystacks, staring at the clouds. (And no, there weren't as many persistent contrails back then for whatever reason.) I grew up with a younger sister and our TV time was restricted, as well as the content. That made me out-of-touch with much of what my peers at school were talking about, and at the time I resented that, but now I'm grateful. Exposure to less junk entertainment in those formative years helped me to develop clearer perception, reasoning and values than my peers, I do believe. Without a doubt, the time outdoors-in the garden, the fields and the forests-was key in fostering the love and attachment I so strongly feel now for plants, animals, insects, mushrooms and mosses, as well as rocks, streams and stars. My urges as an adult to "save the planet" grow directly from these experiences.

Kids don't spend as much time outside as they did in my day, and they are certainly far more supervised when they do. I remember being out of earshot of my parents for hours and hours when I was, say, 11. That isn't even legal anymore in some places, I've heard. Smartphone screens do not offer a replacement for these experiences, not by a long, long shot.

But I suspect that the current that's been flowing in one direction for so long is not only reversible, but might switch directions in the lifetimes of today's young people. The twin trends of increasing complexity in technology and deeper disconnection from nature-so prevalent the last few centuries-could well come to end, though not without discomfort and suffering. Given that current conditions are causing so many extinctions, so much pollution, and so much destruction, I can only view that as a good thing for the planet overall.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Kollibri terre Sonnenblume is a writer, photographer, tree hugger, animal lover, and dissident. Kollibri's work can be found at http://www.macskamoksha.com."



Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Climate Change: Why is it so often "sooner than predicted"?

Do we need a dictatorship to respond to Climate Change?

Forgiving Debt to Invest in Environmental Healing

Assange Indictments are not about Assange: Democrats Need to Drop their Hate and Support him

How We Are All Climate Change Deniers

Reflections on Technology & Culture at my Half-Century Mark

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790

(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 24 fans, 17 articles, 3842 quicklinks, 7091 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I was born in 1941.. I often say the same things that you said here. I am writing about the unintended consequences of an era of transformation. Only with the perspective of time, often centuries, can we grasp the things that happen in the context of a change... like mankind giving up hunting to settle down in one place... and the rise of cities and states, and the need for. militaries.

The industrial revolution not only gave us machines, it gave us pollution and climate change.

The era of information technology gave us television, which was soon co-opted by the propagandists to sell us everything from soap to politicians, and pharmaceuticals. Here is but one link I collected on this topic Tackling the Internet's Central Villain: The Advertising Business

In the nineties, I taught media units in seventh grade, where we looked at what tv presented at the same time as we read the. newspapers. Even the 13 year old saw the way. info was slanted.

I read The Hidden Persuaders byVance Packard, in 1962, when I studied Media & Society. TV was young and the agencies that used human behavior and created the campaigns to influence people were new; the advertising 'mad-men' led the way to the subtle influences that sell everything from soap to politicians by using subliminal messages! Packard predicted that television -- which was was being studied my the psychologists, was this window into our homes which would sell us anything! And back them, the televisions were 12 inch black and white, and you had to get up to change a channel. Walter Cronkite was there, not Sean Hannity. Sigh

But we live in an age where disinformation has been weaponized.

Information technology has presented the naked ape ape with a place of anarchy -- the internet, where anything goes, and anyone can find the open source materials to hack, did you read this piece published alongside yours ?

Countries Want to Ban 'Weaponized' Social Media. What Would That Look Like?

Cyber-space, where anarchy rules, followed by the ubiquitous screen, which addicted the people to unimagined degrees. Video game streamed theft and violence, a nd thus, when a madman streamed a live massacre, the world woke up to the UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES of information technology. Here are some salient quotes from the editorial in the NY Time: as authorities rushed to stop a gunman on a mass killing spree in New Zealand, engineers, programmers and content moderators around the globe were scrambling to keep the rampage from going viral.

It didn't work.

"There is a rapid, dirty river of information coursing through us all day. If you're in the news business, or a consumer of the news business, your reaction to events has to be instant or it is outdated. If you're on social media, there are these swarming mobs who rise out of nowhere, leave people broken and do not stick around to perform the patient Kintsugi act of gluing them back together.

Probably like you, I've felt a great need to take a break from this pace every once in a while and step into a slower dimension of time".don't know about you, but I feel a great hunger right now for timeless pieces like these. "

The internet has accelerated our experience of time. I fear for the survival of good people, as the meanest, mongrels push hatred and division, and outright lies.

Submitted on Saturday, Jun 15, 2019 at 7:23:09 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Kenneth Morris

Become a Fan
Author 506896

(Member since Oct 15, 2016), 2 fans, 7 articles, 232 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

First, happy birthday!

Second, to the content:

You seem to subscribe to the fatalist view that technological changes (whether progress or not) are the result of some inevitable, impersonal force over which humans have scant control. That is, they just happen to us, and proceed according to their own internal imperatives. This view of technological changes is a common one, but I've come to regard it as misleading.

In reality, most of the technological changes foisted upon us (some never see the light of day) are propelled by political economies that encourage them. Generally, governments initiate and fund the basic research, often for perceived military needs, and then establish private economic systems characterized by easy incorporation statutes and regulated stock markets that enable private companies to tweak and then sell the technologies to mass markets. Governments continue to assist the private companies by providing the necessary infrastructure (internet cables, roads, etc.), altering public education in ways consistent with the technologies, and so on. Eventually, the technology becomes so widespread that nearly everyone has to have it, whether they want it or not.

My point is that little of this is inevitable, and in fact could easily be altered by people aware of how technological changes really occur and raising questions about the promotion of them by public funds.

Submitted on Monday, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:59:20 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment