Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Pirates Of The Constitution (Stop The Filibuster, Part 3)

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message The Pen

(Article changed on January 16, 2013 at 14:40)

Pirates of the Constitution
Pirates of the Constitution
(Image by The Pen)
  Details   DMCA

This is the third installment of our mini-series, "How The Filibuster Happened By Accident," titled "Pirates of the  Constitution."  In the first two parts we reviewed how the founding fathers would never have agreed to a procedure requiring a supermajority to pass basic legislation (absent a presidential veto) or approve appointments.

An odd word, filibuster. What does it come from and what does it mean? 

Stop The Filibuster action page: 

It was not until at least 50 years after the Constitutional Convention that some perverse senators had the evil idea of exploiting an inadvertent defect in the rules to hijack the process . . . pirates of the Constitution. And that is exactly how they were viewed at the time. 
The middle of the nineteenth century was the heyday for rogue military adventurers from the United States, organizing their own freelance invasions of Cuba, parts of Mexico, and other countries in Central and South America. In the early 1850s a new word entered the English lexicon to describe their activities. They were called "filibusterers," adopted from the Spanish word "filibustero" for pirates of the 16th and 17th centuries, that word itself derived from the Dutch word "vrijbuiter," for privateer, plunderer or freebooter. 
And virtually no sooner than the word filibuster had been coined to mean military pirates, it was immediately applied to also describe the activity of any Senator who would dare to steal the voting rights of the People by unilaterally and spitefully obstructing legislation. 
According to Merriam-Webster, the very first use of the word filibuster dates from 1851. On February 11, 1853 an entry in The Congressional Record states that, "A filibuster was indulged in which lasted for nine continuous calendar days," demonstrating it was already in common usage in the Senate context. So even though filibusters were rare at first, they were considered wholly disreputable from the beginning. 
So we are not interested at all in assertions that the filibuster is now part of some proud Senate tradition. It was always and will remain a shameful and criminal practice, which is now being so outrageously abused that is must be finally abolished.  
Rate It | View Ratings

The Pen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The Pen is a real person, and the creator of UTalk, a revolutionary new internet radio interface, to make advocacy messages as facile and easy as possible. With this goal in mind we pioneered one click action pages in the political realm, now (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

They've Literally Punched A Hole Into Hell, We Need A Crash Alternative Energy Program Now, Assuming We Even Survive

If You Are Not Angry About The Democratic Platform TPP Scam You Are Not Paying Attention

A Supreme Act Of Judicial Treason Against The People Of The United States, And What We Can And Must Do About It

Obama's New "Improved" Leech Therapy

The President Can And Must Invoke 31 USC 3102 To Pay Our National Debts

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend