Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 28 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 1/1/14

Obama 2013: How low can you go?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)
Source: RT

No doubt 2013 will go down as Barack Obama's annus horribilis. The President of the United States (POTUS) currently faces a 55 percent disapproval rating on "the way he is handling his job," according to the latest Washington Post-ABC poll.

Not exactly a train wreck, considering POTUS has been presiding over the unforgiving destruction of the American middle class, with a whopping 76 percent of working Americans living paycheck-to-paycheck. Moreover, in his year-end press conference, POTUS still insisted his administration has struck the right balance between spying and privacy, although admitting, "there may be other ways of skinning the cat."

In foreign policy, "other ways of skinning the cat" has been largely interpreted by frightened US puppets -- of the House of Saud kind -- as the hyperpower dangerously receding. Not really; the strategy of team POTUS is rather an attempt at re-jigging the game while trying to stay in the lead.

If it looks awkward, that's because it is; after all, for the past decades, US foreign policy moves almost always contribute to crystallize non-stop instability in the fault lines. So no wonder 2013 has been a succession of spectacular new lows, although culminating with a possible new high.

Lockdown or else

This February, in his State of the Union address, Obama promised to "help" Libya, Yemen and Somalia, not to mention Mali; failure on all fronts. He promised to "engage" Russia (in fact Russia ended up engaging him). He promised to seduce Asia with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) -- a collection of ultra-dodgy corporate-friendly free-trade scams (Asia was not seduced). He promised to "stand" with those who want freedom in the Middle East (that does not include people from Bahrain).

As this was Capitol Hill, Obama had to recite the Hail Mary; "preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons"; putting more "pressure" on Syria -- whose "regime kills its own people"; and remaining "steadfast" with Israel.

Then came the Boston bombing, whose chief consequence was a monster dry run for urban martial law -- euphemized as "lockdown" -- in a very near American future. As total militarization of civilian life goes -- featuring Homeland Security running amok with hundreds of armored vehicles -- this beat any Hollywood blockbuster.

The intersection of Baltimore Parkway and Maryland Route 32 also danced with the stars; that business park a mile away from the NSA, known as the largest concentration of cyber power on the planet, all about the gung-ho privatization of spying -- call it "Digital Blackwater" -- was at the heart of the Snowden scandal.

Piling up on Obama's infamous kill lists, the Snowden leaks revealed details of how the NSA black hole lords over all as the ultimate Panopticon. And how PRISM -- as expressed in its Dark Side of the Moon-ish logo -- is no less than a graphic expression of the ultimate Pentagon/neo-con wet dream; the Full Spectrum Dominance doctrine. After all the NSA -- also known as No Such Agency -- is part of the Pentagon.

The Obama administration could not possibly dismiss Full Spectrum Dominance, which was conceptualized way back in the Pentagon's 2002 Joint Vision 2020. And Snowden did not expose anything that was not already known -- or at least suspected -- since 2002.

So Obama and the US government had nothing to spin, except that PRISM is benign; PRISM is legal; it only targets non-US citizens outside of the US; and well, it "may" sweep US citizens' digital information. That's also legal but we can't tell you how.

Snowden made Obama look like a clown, surfing the PR tsunami as a master -- and controlling it all the way (yes, you do learn a thing or two at the CIA). The timing of his disclosure was a beauty; it handed China the ultimate gift just as Obama was harassing President Xi Jinping about cyber war at a California summit.

Humiliation by a private contractor was followed with severe rhetorical spanking by the Russian President. At the G8 summit in Northern Ireland, Putin went for the jugular, addressing Obama face to face:

"Your country sent its army to Afghanistan in the year 2001 on the excuse that you are fighting the Taliban and the Al-Qaeda organization and other fundamentalist terrorists whom your government accused of carrying out the 11 September attacks on New York and Washington. And here you are today making an alliance with them in Syria. And you and your allies are declaring your desire to send them weapons. And here you have Qatar in which you [the US] have your biggest base in the region and in the territory of that country the Taliban are opening a representative office."

That was just a prelude for the real action. POTUS screamed and shouted because he wanted his spy back. Snowden, following Russian laws, was granted temporary asylum. The White House was "disappointed." And a sullen POTUS snubbed the bilateral summit with Putin in Moscow coinciding with the G-20 in St Petersburg. The Kremlin was equally "disappointed."

POTUS by now was morphing from "Yes, We Can" to "Yes, We Scan" and finally "Yes, We Scorn." This might have frightened assorted poodles of the Euroland kind, but it didn't stick to Vlad the Hammer, who quickly evaluated how the Obama administration turned its already shaky "credibility" to ashes on two simultaneous fronts; because of the scale of the Orwellian/Panopticon complex detailed by Snowden's leaks, and because of the way he was being mercilessly hunted.

Feel free to bask in my credibility

Then POTUS outdid himself, creating a -- what else -- "credibility" problem when, recklessly, he pronounced the use of chemical weapons in Syria a "red line."

So the US government urgently needed to punish the transgressor -- to hell with evidence -- to maintain its "credibility." But this time it would be "limited." "Tailored." Only "a few days." A "shot across the bow" -- as POTUS qualified it. Still, some -- but not all -- "high-value targets," including command and control facilities and delivery systems in Syria would have to welcome a barrage of 384 Tomahawk cruise missiles already positioned in the eastern Mediterranean. I called it, at the time, Operation Tomahawk With Cheese.

So in the week marking the 12th anniversary of 9/11, POTUS was fighting for his bombing ''credibility,'' trying to seduce Republican hawks in the US Congress while most of the warmongers du jour happened to be Democrats.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 7   Well Said 5   Valuable 4  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend