Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 2/14/20

No One Can Pass the Democrat's Litmus Tests

Author 86186
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert De Filippis
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)

Decisions
Decisions
(Image by ldifranza)
  Details   DMCA

Behind every public behavior is an almost infinite amount of information that is completely unknown to the person doing the behaving. Our actions derive from decisions made at the subconscious level the instant before the action. Then the explanation comes after the behavior, designed to fit into the current context and made to seem justifiable for the circumstances. Don't take my word for it, do the research yourself.

So how is it that we can assess another person's behavior and explain their motivations, if we can't even explain our own? But somehow, we think we know another person is a racist, or a sexist, or you name it.

Yes, past actions are a pretty good predictor of future behavior but there is no way to account for variations in circumstances. And circumstances are as big a part of behavior as is the personality of the individual.

Let's use a scientific formula to be clear. To attempt to predict the future of anything we must define the initial conditions, the boundary conditions and apply an entailing law. Stuart Kaufman complex systems researcher and Joseph Traub, professor of computer science at Columbia University, point out we have no mathematical model, nor can we simulate a system without knowing its boundary conditions.

In personality theory, boundary conditions are the circumstances a person finds him/herself in as they subconsciously decide what action to take. Not knowing what the circumstances will be, we cannot calculate an entailing law (e.g. "he always does this") consequently we cannot accurately predict human behavior. The best we can do is estimate probabilities based on past history.

But what about the idea that an adult criminal starts doing criminal acts in childhood? Two points here: One, we're talking about normal healthy personalities. Two, even those of us who have healthy personalities can be driven to the point of committing horrible acts. As an example, think about war and how a normal young person can be trained to kill people when they wouldn't dream of it in normal circumstances. Think of how they come home with PTSD and some commit suicide. Not so much because what they've seen, but because of what they've done.

For some reason, the American mind seems to be oblivious to systems thinking, i.e., how the many systems within which we live affect our actions. This gives us an impoverished model to predict how a politician will act in the future. We cannot only consider the individual and not the circumstances within which that person behaved in the past. We do so at our own peril.

And I'm not only referring to those whom we don't like, but also those we do. Promises made on the campaign trail are generally devoid of consideration for the circumstances that will follow if the candidate is elected. But there are some predictable systems indicators.

The political scene in United States today is a toxic brew of might is right, a meanness born of self-pity, unfocused anger at the system, and psychological mayhem. My question is who is best suited to do battle in these circumstances?

I didn't think I'd ever say this but let's take a page out of the Evangelical playbook. They've canonized the monster in the White House, not because of who he is but because they believe he will bring them the future they fantasize. He's the warrior with the character flaws but he gets things done according to their world view.

While we look for the candidate who is the paragon of ideological purity and moral virtue, they're destroying the country.

Robert DeFilippis

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert De Filippis Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Author, columnist, and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I've authored and published seven books: "You, Your Self and the 21st Century,"The Flowers Are Talking to Me," and "Faith (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments  Post Comment


Lew Weingarth

Become a Fan
Author 512948
(Member since Jan 22, 2019), 3 fans, 5 articles, 40 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I see this quite differently. I agree the Republican Party has been 100% corrupt and hasn't represented more than a handful of voters for 50 years. However, the Democratic Party hasn't represented many more voters. A recent study by Princeton showed that legislation doesn't represent what 99.9% of voters want AT ALL, in fact it's slightly negative correlation. Since the corrupt SCOTUS legalized purchasing political influence, the situation has gotten steadily worse, with Clinton pushing the SS cuts Trump is now denying waivers on, and Obama working hard to hide military activities from the citizens. I would love a candidate who supports what voters want 100%, but I'd be DELIGHTED if we got one who AT LEAST supports what voters want 10%, or even 1%, at least don't make things worse.

Submitted on Saturday, Feb 15, 2020 at 4:58:05 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 2 fans, 1 quicklinks, 355 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lew Weingarth:   New Content
"...at least don't make things worse."

One reason I voted Green the last two Presidential elections, was that I reasoned that the best I could do between Democrat or Republican would be choosing the one who would still be making matters worse, just not making them worse quite as fast. It was a choice I refused to make, and I am still reluctant to make such a choice if that's what I think it comes down to. I supported Bernie in the 2016 primaries because I thought there was a chance he might actually make things better and then voted Green when Clinton became the candidate. Bad as Trump may be, I might still choose that way again if I think the Democrat candidate will continue our progress on the path toward the destruction of our physical world and society.

Part of the reason I am willing to act that way is, unlike many who oppose Trump, I don't believe that four more years of Trump will be an immediate disaster but rather "merely" another step in that direction. Therefore, I may be willing to postpone an immediate slight relief in acceleration for a longer range possible actual gain.

Submitted on Saturday, Feb 15, 2020 at 7:43:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment