Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 3/22/10

Moving on, Next; The War of Words on Health Care

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   66 comments
If the health reform reconciliation passes in the senate, the next stage will be a war of words.

I'm moving on. The phase of fighting for a better bill is over. Progressives lost. We were screwed, lied to, deceived. But today is today and we need to deal with what's on the table today.

We need to reassess relationships and get down to work. For one thing, we want to get behind Allen Grayson's bill that allows anyone to buy into medicare. And we need to minimize the damage done this fall. Regardless of how they feel about the current bill, Progressives don't want more right wingers in congress and don't want teabaggers in congress. Wishing for that is what my late mother called "cutting off your nose to spite your face."

The Republicans have telegraphed their big punch-- attack on passing a bill that is not paid for, that is going to raise taxes and take away freedom. They think they have a slam dunk... or at least that's what they said repeatedly in their failed efforts to intimidate bluedog Democrats. They're also going to hammer on the fact that there is a mandate for everyone to buy health insurance. I'm just not sure how big a deal that is. I think that most of the people who vote for Republicans already have insurance and have been paying for it. People who can't afford it will get help, and anyway, the mandated payments don't kick in this year.

The Dems may be in better shape than the GOP and it's media surrogates suggest. The Democrats have been planning and setting up their position and election strategy for the fall:

  • They ran public hearings where ten second video segments of GOP members could be used against them.
  • They are presenting the legislation as historic, as important as civil rights legislation, as something that will enhance the USA's respect throughout the world. In other words, they're framing this as a noble, honorable act that embraces the values of the founders of the USA.

Then, the bill has immediate changes that will make some people happy:
  • Seniors will have their prescription "donut hole" partially filled, with a $250 rebate.
  • Small businesses will see rebates coming to them to pay for health care. That will help a lot of small businesses and their employees. It will also help small businesses compete for better employees.
  • Families will be able to keep their young adults on their family plans until they turn 26, instead of the current policy of most insurers to drop children at age 19 or, until they finish college or turn 23.
  • Insurance companies won't be able to drop people from being covered when they get sick. This process, called recision, was usually done on the pretext that people had previously un-reported pre-existing conditions, like acne, spousal abuse, etc.
  • Lifetime coverage limits will be eliminated.
  • Insurers will no longer be allowed to bar children from coverage because of pre-existing conditions. Parents will be able to sleep better knowing, if they lose their job, their sick child will still be eligible for health care.
  • Adults with pre-existing conditions will have access to health coverage through a new program.

The $250 rebate is a big, obvious benefit.

Most of the others may not be. It is up to the Democrats to get the mainstream media talking about those benefits, to use whatever means possible to make beneficiaries aware. Their history at messaging is not hopeful. If the Dems are smart, they'll literally invest millions, not in single campaigns, but in doing crowd-sourced, bottom up research-- focus groups, on-line polls, conventional polls-- to identify language, wording and talking points that are most effective in getting out a message that resonates and sticks.

Every bullet listed above-- the positive ones that support them and the negative ones that attack them-- should be re-branded and reframed with simple phrases that people can understand and personally relate to. Consider how the right re-framed inheritance taxes as "the death tax." I've thrown some off-the-top-of-my-head ideas after the benefits listed below, hilighted in green.

  • Seniors prescription "donut hole":Rx Rescue or End the Medication versus Food choice
  • Small businesses health coverage rebates: Helps Small Business Fund Health Care
  • young adults on family plans 'til 26: Protects your older children or Keep your Family Health Care Whole
  • Ending recision: Protection from rip-off cancellations when you get sick
  • Lifetime coverage limits will be eliminated: End the illness coverage death balloon
  • Insurers can't bar children from coverage because of pre-existing conditions. Keeps your sick child covered, if you change or lose your job.
  • Adults with pre-existing conditions will have access to health coverage through a new program. Ends the Pre-existing condition Punishment

I know. Some of them are lame. Recently, I told Barbara Boxer the members of the senate needed to work on better word framing on the issues they were advocating. She replied that she was depending on the progressive media to help. Today, on Morning Joe, John Cornyn said almost the identical thing, when told that the Republicans had done a weak, ineffective job at telling the public about the tax increases that would come out of the bill.

So, get involved in some bottom-up crowdsourcing here. Make suggestions about framing AND about steps progressives need to take now to keep the change going so we move closer to public option and single payer. And while you're at it, come up with better framing for Public Option and single payer. Those words suck.
Well Said 3   Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. 

Check out his platform at

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites,

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend