Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

McChrystal Must Go

By       Message Richard Wise     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Everyone seems to be treating General Stanley McChrystal's disastrous Rolling Stone article as a bungled media event. It's not. It is a clear case of insubordination, and McChrystal should be fired and replace at once.

The Forbes article advises people in situations like McChrystal's to (1) do their homework on the media outlets they grant interviews to; (2) be selective in the reporters they speak to; and (3) don't go native or let down your guard.

That's fine advice for civilian honchos but not for military leaders. McChrystal's problem is not his lack of media savvy, although he seems to have little of that; it's his failure to understand and accept that he has a boss; and that his superior, the commander-in-chief, is and always must be a civilian.

The lowest seaman or private gets that. The newest 2nd lieutenant or ensign gets that in spades. It's part of the indoctrination. But they seem to forget that lesson on their way to becoming generals or admirals.

This is not McChrystal's first political gaffe. In early 2009, right after Obama took office and was deciding what to do about Afghanistan, McChrystal went public with his "demand" for 40,000 more troops. The implication was that if Obama did not bend to McChrystal's will, the war would be lost and it would be Obama's fault. He got a talking-to from the Pentagon and the White House for that. Strike one.

A few months ago, McChrystal went public with the revelation of a trillion dollars' worth of mineral reserves in Afghanistan; this, to pressure civilian leaders to give him $34 billion more starting in July. Again, if he didn't get the money the war would be lost and it would be Obama's fault. Strike two.

Now this: openly contemptuous and critical statements from him and his direct reports regarding the civilian leadership. Strike three.

Forbes says in McChrystal's defense that most of the derogatory comments described in the article came from unnamed aides to McChrystal. That doesn't matter. Whether he makes the comments himself or "causes or allows" them to be made is immaterial. Either way, they demonstrate McChrystal's failure to lead, to set a positive example; to demonstrate loyalty "up and down the chain of command," and to subordinate himself to the civilian leadership.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

www.opednews.com
Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?