Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Martha Raddatz Repeats the "Big Lie" About Social Security & Medicare

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   1 comment
Message Katherine Acosta

During last Thursday's vice-presidential debate, moderator Martha Raddatz said:

Let's talk about Medicare and entitlements. Both Medicare and Social Security are going broke and taking a larger share of the budget in the process (emphasis added).

Will benefits for Americans under these programs have to change for the programs to survive?

Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan responded by doubling down on the "big lie":

Absolutely. Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt. These are indisputable facts (emphasis added).

It was one of the few lies that did not cause Vice President Joe Biden to roll his eyes or otherwise mock his opponent and correct him.  Instead, he merely promised that the Democrats would not privatize the program.   That's because no matter which party wins the presidency, Social Security will be under attack.  The only difference is that one party proposes to "save" it through death of a thousand cuts, while the other wants to privatize it.

The "big lie," of course, refers to the propaganda technique of repeating a lie over and over until it becomes accepted truth.  Bush II explained the technique in his own inimitable way when he attempted in 2005 to convince citizens at a town hall meeting in Greece, New York that privatizing Social Security was a good idea:

See, in my line of work, you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.

At least he was being honest about what he was doing.

But now it is past time to "catapult" the anti-propaganda.  As linguistics professor George Lakoff has pointed out in his books and articles, well-established "frames" are not changed by one exposure to the facts.  Therefore, in preparation for the coming battle to save Social Security, we need to commit to memory and repeat the following over and over to friends, co-workers, relatives, and neighbors; to tweet and comment online; and to write letters to the editor and politicians countering anyone who reiterates the "big lie."  (Note: This is preparation for organizing and fighting attacks on Social Security, not the battle itself.)

1)  Social Security is not broke and does not contribute to the deficit.  By law, Social Security cannot, and has never, paid out more than it takes in. Even with no changes to the program, it is fully funded for next quarter century, after which it can pay out 75% of benefits. The Social Security Trust Fund currently has a surplus of $2.5 trillion.

2)  The "problem" with Social Security is that the federal government has borrowed our funds and now doesn't want to pay us back.   Paul Craig Roberts, assistant secretary to the treasury during the Reagan administration, explains the heist :

Two Wall Street henchmen, Alan Greenspan and David Stockman, set up the Social Security raid in this way: The Carter administration had put Social Security in the black for the foreseeable future by establishing a schedule for future Social Security payroll tax increases. Greenspan and Stockman conspired to phase in the payroll tax increases earlier than was needed in order to gain surplus Social Security revenues that could be used to finance other government spending, thus reducing the budget deficit. They sold it to President Reagan as "putting Social Security on a sound basis."

Along the way Americans were told that the surplus revenues were going into a special Social Security trust fund at the U.S. Treasury. But what is in the fund is Treasury IOUs for the spent revenues. When the "trust funds" are needed to pay Social Security benefits, the Treasury will have to sell more debt in order to redeem the IOUs.

Social Security was mugged again during the Clinton administration when the Boskin Commission jimmied the Consumer Price Index in order to reduce the inflation adjustments that Social Security recipients receive, thus diverting money from Social Security retirees to other uses.

Now, instead of cutting military spending or requiring the Social Security tax to be paid on earnings over $100,000 in order recover our funds and pay benefits due, they instead want to cut benefits, raise the retirement age, and in the case of Republicans, privatize the program (translation: turn the money over to Wall Street).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Katherine Acosta Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Katherine Acosta holds a PhD in Sociology and has previously worked as a university lecturer and researcher.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is Anarchism a Political Philosophy Whose Time Has Come?

Martha Raddatz Repeats the "Big Lie" About Social Security & Medicare

On Occupy, Anarchism, & Corporatism: A Response to Don Smith

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend