Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/2/16

Libya: The New Pipedream of the Opium of the Aristocrats

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jonathan Ferguson
Become a Fan

Note: the following, in italics, is a comment I placed on an article by the UK politician Tom Brake. However, I will subsequently elaborate slightly upon my views.

Yet another intervention would be extremely unwise. War is not self-sustaining; it is sustained by a series of decisions. Further interference in the internal affairs of sovereign nations would merely be imperialism by another name; no unity government can represent all the citizens of its nation.

The history of humanitarian interventionism is a history of self-interest, dishonesty and badly cloaked partisanship. Daesh would not even exist if it were not for such corrupt and self-serving ideologies.

The chain of disastrous and self-serving interventions has to be cut off, and sooner rather than later. Humanitarian interventionism is a tool of the mighty to oppress the weak; it can bring nothing but disaster, except to the powerful, who know well how to benefit from it.

The White Man's Burden belongs back in the 19th century with anti-'sodomy' laws, blasphemy laws and the right of men to treat women as their own property. It is a barbarous relic of our neanderthal ancestors; and everyone in this world, save a privileged few, would be immensely better off without it.

The Washington government want us to participate in their headlong plunge into this white-supremacist imperialist morass; let's be smart, and have the attitude of Harold Wilson, not Tony Blair and Anthony Eden.

To this I add: the fallacy of good intentions can justify anything. Warmongering in the name of purported 'good intentions' is no less destructive than warmongering with avowedly cynical intentions. And of course, there is another disturbing question: How sincere are these pure as the driven snow 'good intentions,' really, after all?

Rate It | View Ratings

Jonathan Ferguson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jonathan Ferguson is a socio-economic liberal with strong libertarian leanings in some key issues.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Economic, Social and Class Privilege of the "Global Citizens"

Our Radical Socialist Library System is Incompatible with True Liberty, I.e. Market Fundamentalism (IRONY)

Footprints in the Desert (With Edward Said)

Philosophy of the Apology: Saying Sorry in a Patriarchal World

'The Good of Humanity' is a Blank Check for Tyranny

Renaming my Racial Privilege Series on OpEdNews: Reflexivity and Zooming Out

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend