Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   7 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Leave it to Priebus

By       Message Anthony Barnes     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 2425
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on May 30, 2013 at 10:40)


- Advertisement -

(Image by Illustration by DonkeyHotey via Flickr)   Permission   Details   DMCA

by Illustration by DonkeyHotey via Flickr

by Illustration by DonkeyHotey via Flickr

by Illustration by DonkeyHotey via Flickr
THE CLOSER - GOP crypt-keeper Reince Priebus

"Where will you run; if there is no world of your own? And you know that no one will ever miss you; when you're finally gone"" --"A Sign of the Ages," by Gil Scot-Heron

The buzzards had been circling long before GOP crypt-keeper Reince Priebus and the Republicans finally reached the startling conclusion that their Party was doing a bit of circling of its own -- down the drain -- and that an autopsy of its brain-dead anatomy was in order. Perhaps they were too focused on reclaiming the White House at any cost. Thus, they failed to notice the little things -- like Frank Luntz's specialized, focus-group-tested code jargon being just so much furrow-browed psycho-linguistics to contemporary political cognition. Or even worse, the big things -- like the fact that Dean Chambers ' screwy "unskewed" polling were as chaotic to the senses as a visit to Sierra Leone in the '90's.

- Advertisement -

Indeed, there had been many non-political science/history types -- I among them -- who for quite some time have seen in the Republican Party what the Doomsday Preppers see in society at large. Others warned that the GOP was a steadily decomposing, multi-headed Cyclops rotting on a downward angle. They spoke of its drift away from the astute political wisdom of the David Frums and George Wills toward the philosophical waywardness of the Rush Limbaughs and Glenn Becks. There was talk of a politically narrow future at best for the GOP; 0f a regional Party of state governors and legislators, city councilors and town clerks sustained by gerrymandering districts into formations that resemble the works of Picasso during his cubism stage.

And that's a best case scenario.

In fact, shortly after John McCain lost to Barack Obama in 2008, yours truly made assertions about the bubble-headed idolatry bestowed upon the relatively unknown Sarah Palin that lofted the GOP, its base and Palin herself into the political stratosphere beginning the moment she was announced as McCain's running mate .

Palin's sudden emergence injected a near-lethal overdose of virulent superficiality to a familiar derangement syndrome afflicting our body politic. Unlike the hate that fueled Bush Derangement Disorder (which the other side has transferred over to Obama), the Palin strain was a hybrid; the spawn of a volcanic eruption of delusional love for the vacuous "Thriller from Wasilla." That stuporous reaction, engendered primarily by the Tea Party, pulsated a wave of cognitive dissonance that rattled the foundation of electoral support that in 2004, enabled Republicans to win a presidential race that it perhaps should have lost. The result is that by 2012, Republicans wound up losing an arguably winnable contest.

As I noted in a November, 2008 article published in OpEd News, rather than being recognized as something wicked this way comes, the GOP base's "eyes wide shut" embrace of the conniving Palin in the immediate aftermath of McCain's defeat illustrated the potential for Palin and others like her to lead the GOP straight down the road to irrelevant-political-relic status. Back then I wrote :


Indeed just days outside of the election, Palin was spinning away from McCain while simultaneously refusing to rule out a Senate run in 2010, or a go for the presidential gold in 2012, reasoning that it would be "crazy to close a door" of potential opportunity prematurely.

- Advertisement -


Do I wish (her) luck? You betcha!

Why? Because if success is not defined as expanding the overall Republican base to include more moderates, minorities, young people, gays and women, and broadening its social agenda, but is instead viewed as Palin simply collaring her party's dwindling and rapidly-scattering base of hard-core conservatives, that success will also ultimately lead to the swift devolution of the GOP into little more than a kooky, neo-Libertarian fringe party.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Anthony Barnes, of Boston, Massachusetts, is a free-lance writer who leans toward the progressive end of the political spectrum. "When I was a young man, I wanted to change the world. I found it was difficult to change the world, so I tried to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

SURPRISE! Chris Christie's 2016 Gambit

Starlight and Shadows



ERRORS AND NO FACTS: Business as Usual at Fox News

Death of the Republican Party