Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/25/19

Katy Barr the Door*

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 50778
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

As is widely known, Donald J. Trump hired William Barr as his personal lawyer inside the Justice Department (oops, I mean Attorney General) for one reason only: to try to shut down the Mueller investigation entirely and prevent any of its findings/reports from reaching the light of day. Lacking achievement of that objective (and it could have existed only in Trump's head, and perhaps the heads of one or more of his children and his acolytes at Fox"News"), Barr's assignment was: a) to short circuit Mueller's work to the extent possible and b) to make as light of the findings as possible. (Let me point out here, that for the most part I don't enter a claim for total originality in this column, only for certain bits and pieces and for the ordering of the items in it.)

William Barr: Why is this man smiling?
William Barr: Why is this man smiling?
(Image by DonkeyHotey)
  Details   DMCA

As to the first objective, it is very likely that the probe came to what is really a sudden end, not because Mueller was finished, but because, as he has the power to do, Barr cut the budget, sharply. Indications of budget cuts? For one, Andrew Weisman's sudden departure. Indications that Mueller was not anywhere near finished? Well, extending Rick Gates' sentencing until May for one. For another, he did have the indictment of Roger Stone hanging out there. But now the chances of/opportunity for his "flipping" have become sharply diminished. As to the second Trumpite objective, with the release of the "Barr Letter" we don't know what the Mueller Reports says, even in general terms. We only know what Barr says it says (and that, of course is why Trump hired him in the first place).

- Advertisement -

Of course, the demands for the release of the full document (ex any redactions that need to be made to protect national security) came almost immediately, from a wide variety of sources. And as John Dean, Nixon White House counsel turned State's evidence, said: "We haven't really seen the underlying report, but I have some suspicions that the reason he [Barr] boiled this down the way he did is because it's not very attractive. . . . [Mueller's] words are very different than Barr's, I suspect."

Indeed. And there will be a very simple indicator of the truth or lack thereof of that statement: the degree to which the Trumpites fight to prevent the release of the whole Report. If they have nothing to hide, they should want the full document made public. Of course, as has been frequently noted, the Trumpites' constant campaign-of-destruction against Mueller and the probe indicate the strong possibility that there is more than one election-undermining plot plus who knows what else (see for example Michael Cohen's testimony, and well beyond that, what's in the documents of his that the Federal, and now New York State, authorities have) that the Trumpites don't want revealed.

And so, the process proceeds (covered in a bit more detail just below). The House investigations will continue, accompanied of course by demands for the full Report (plus other materials, like Trump's tax returns). Unless they too are shut down Barr (and don't count that out) the investigations by Southern District of New York, the Eastern District of Virginia, and the District of Columbia (and who knows what other possible Federal jurisdictions) will proceed, along with the those of the New York State Attorney General and possibly other state A.G.'s as well. Like New Jersey, where Trump's casinos crashed and burned. It now happens to have a Democratic administration.

- Advertisement -

Tax Return: would that it were that easy --- for the public to get hold of Trump's (plural).
Tax Return: would that it were that easy --- for the public to get hold of Trump's (plural).
(Image by Got Credit)
  Details   DMCA

The Trumpites will be screaming: "EXONERATION," "LEAKS," "THE DOSSIER," "Witch hunt," "harassment," "never should have been started," "Democratic plot," and so on and so forth. But unfortunately for them, whether or not the full Mueller Report is ever made public, as is well-known Trump faces an ever-mounting pile of other legal difficulties. Some of them are listed for reference here:

1. The convictions or admissions of guilt, for everything from perjury to false statements to Congress or the FBI, to tax fraud, either on Trump's behalf or somehow connected directly or indirectly, to a Trump activity/interest: George Papadopoulos, Mike Flynn, Mike Cohen, Paul Manafort, Mike Cohen, and Rick Gates.

2. The evidence, from Mike Cohen and potentially others (like Felix Sater and Alan Weisselberg) that Trump was negotiating for a Trump Tower Moscow deal during the Presidential Campaign, in exchange for what? That Trump was telling the U.S. electorate that he had "no business with Russia" is an interesting sidelight, but obviously not criminal

3. As best as we can make out, according to the Internal Revenue Service "under audit" is no impediment to releasing one's tax returns. Surely Trump has nothing to hide in them, does he? So, if that's the case, why not just go ahead and release them? But crimes might be hidden there, like simple tax evasion by understating annual income(s). Of course, that's another reason why Barr might have barred the door: he didn't want Mueller turning over such a case to another Federal prosecutor.

- Advertisement -

4. On that famous "Trump Tower meeting." We don't yet know whether or not Trump knew about it for sure (although surely, if Don Jr. didn't report on it that would likely be the only time something significant happened at a meeting involving either their business or the campaign where Jr. didn't report it to Dad), just to satisfy everyone who wants to know just what went on in it --- given that of course nothing illegal, potentially illegal, or unethical took place, that might just be considered by some --- if not Mueller himself --- "collusion."

5. Then there are the payoffs to Karen McDougal and Stephanie Clifford, and the "Mike Cohen checks," would could indicate anything from bank fraud to election campaign law violations.

6. Then there's the possible sub-borning of perjury to Michael Cohen.

7. As for the Cohen documents, as far as we know, Mueller didn't look at them. That was an SDNY operation.

8. And then we get to the tax fraud (e.g., understating your assets/income), bank fraud (e.g., overstating assets to obtain loans, see Deutsche Bank, and oops, they will shortly be turning over records to several different agencies), insurance fraud (overstating the value of property lost) --- all, according to Cohen at least, and he does claim to have documentation, undertaken by Trump at one time or another. Then there is possible involvement in money-laundering, for which Deutsche Bank has been well-known. Deutsche Bank has already paid $630 million in fines for laundering Russian money from various sources.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Funny 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a "Trusted Author," he is a Senior Editor, (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments

pablo mayhew

Become a Fan
Author 95209

(Member since Aug 14, 2014), 12 fans, 7 articles, 1612 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

Military tribunals coming. Treason. But not for Trump.

Obama, the Clintons, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Comey, and many, many others--including a coterie of CIA-run corporate mainstream media "celebrities," and likely some degenerate Hollywood swine.

Viable information abounds on the chans that Iran currently possesses six U.S. "Davy Crockett" tactical nuclear weapons, and has done so since Benghazi. A seventh was used by Syrian rebels to kill 20 Russian special forces in Syria in September 2016.

Vladimir Putin responded--in a clear indication to Hillary Clinton of what she could expect, if somehow she managed to slither into the White House:

click here

Nuclear provocation of Russia? Sadly, yes. Some Democrats (globalist slime), it appears, have been quite naughty over the last decade or so. Of course, they were in cahoots all along with globalist slime on the Republican side--the neocon crowd that surrounded the presidency of Dick Cheney--which further illustrates how utterly loathsome and phony the American political duopoly really has become over the last half century.

Now it's time to pay the piper, as it were. Once this all plays out--the Great Awakening that has begun--it is quite conceivable that the Democratic Party will simply cease to exist. Criminals have amassed on both sides of the aisle. Once patriots divulge the heinous deeds of Obama and HRC, though, the DNC will take the brunt of the rap.

They never thought she would lose. Prepare for a wild ride--pain is coming.

Submitted on Monday, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:55:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)


Become a Fan
Author 3669

(Member since Nov 14, 2006), 14 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

Seems I need to repost what I said in response to yesterday's similar article by Michael Collins. Please look beyond your Trump Derangement Syndrome, I'm not so fond of him and some of his policies either, but there's a far bigger issue here. It lies not with Trump, but with 'the other side' who created a 'Russiagate' conspiracy for partisan reasons that nearly tore the nation in two.

What i said to Collins similar story:

In the end one thing is clear: 'Russiagate' never happened. It was a conspiracy theory that appears created by the CIA, FBI, Obama DOJ, Clinton campaign and collusion by the corporate media. Trump might not be my desired type of politician and I disagree with his many of his policies. But, he got rid of the TPP, he didn't push WW-III in Syria and he is trying to defuse the nuclear standoff on the Korean Peninsula. He's been able to repatriate some manufacturing jobs to the USA. These achievements are clearly not in line with globalist corporatocracy plans. Hence why 'Russiagate' was created.

Trump is correct in describing it as a treasonous plot, a witch hunt. Just because he's right wing and has anti environmental policies and pursued criminal regime change in Latin America (like all US presidents) doesn't change the issue that Russiagate was an illegal attempt to overthrow an elected president. That is what needs to be condemned.

Separate out the environment and Venezuela and Yemen, but give Trump his due for his antiglobalist stance. And save the vestiges of US democracy by going after the perpetrators of the Russiagate conspiracy theory.

Submitted on Tuesday, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:35:56 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)

Art Costa

Become a Fan
Author 48718

(Member since May 19, 2010), 1 fan, 559 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

Reply to ruckrover:   New Content

My hunch is you are right. The motives seem accurate from his campaigning, and some of what he clearly did. Even those policies like the environment ("tearing up" of Paris Accord) fall in line with corporate establishment policy of evermore hydrocarbon and the Accord, while a faint starting place, was without any means of enforcement.

Trump is simply calling the whole establishment a sham from top to bottom. His corruption is also in line with that of DC players and corporate puppeteers. As he noted in his campaign - he gave to all of them.

What the world needs to a complete transformation - that, I suspect will only happen post-collapse if extinction doesn't wipe out much of this destructive species and with it life in general.

He's been playing with a lot of fire regarding nuclear confrontation - but it was Obama that started the nuclear weapons race with his trillion plus "investment" in nuclear modernization. (It was Hannah Arendt who identified how evil can manifest itself as she followed the Eichmann trial - Banality of Evil. Trump disrupts this for blatant destruction of humanity and the Earth.

Submitted on Tuesday, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:53:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment