Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

In Defense of Lawyers (Yes, Lawyers!)

By Arthur Joel Katz  Posted by Walter Brasch (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

Arthur Joel Katz  
         This is an admission against interest, as lawyers say:  I am a graduate of Columbia Law School, I taught at Columbia, I was a law clerk to a federal judge and I spent the three happiest work years of my life practicing law in New York.
    I have regretted for the last 52 years that I left the law to go into the motion picture-television business.  I did it for the money and I am not glad. 
- Advertisement -
         The public perception of lawyers is summed up by the following joke:  What do you call the sinking of a ship with five hundred lawyers on board?  Answer:  a good start.          Lawyers constantly get bad press.  The medical establishment blames them for malpractice suits that are frequent and often successful.  Of course, the medical establishment doesn’t blame mistakes by doctors or hospitals.   Maybe, just maybe, that is the cause. 
         Insurance companies promote the idea that the personal injury bar is nothing but a bunch of ambulance chasers that bring strike suits against innocent drivers who they happen to insure.   Maybe.  But  if you are knocked down by a drunk driver, or even someone who was chatting on a cell phone at  the time, you probably will do a lot better if you are represented by a lawyer than relying on the “fairness” of the driver’s insurance company. 
         The lobbyists for the major corporations do everything possible to protect themselves from their own stockholders’ suits while paying the CEOs and upper management millions in salaries and benefits.  Every now and then those awful lawyers manage to reign in the process.
- Advertisement -
          Product liability suits, usually class actions, enrich successful lawyers while sometime getting rather small damages to the individuals who were harmed by the product.
   On the other hand, those plaintiffs pay no fees or expenses if there is no recovery and an unsuccessful product liability lawyer who loses a big one can go broke.
          That notion, the payment of fees to lawyers, especially large ones, really gets the public’s goat.  But there is not much complaint about large payments to doctors, dentists, accountants or stock market manipulators.  Did I mention hospitals? My wife was in St. Luke’s for two successive three day periods during which they never found out what was wrong with her.  The bill was something over $50,000.   We have threatened to hire a lawyer and sue for malpractice, never mind overcharging.
          This is not to say that lawyers are all perfect, or that some of them are guilty as publicly charged.  And, unhappily, they are not all brilliant.  But usually, when someone wants to sue or defend against a suit, his or her lawyer is somehow a knight in shinning armor, the repository of truth and justice.
          In criminal cases, the public almost inevitably assumes that the charge is true and the lawyer defending the accused is as bad as he client for taking the side of a criminal. 
         When you think about it, all this is quite odd.  We inherited  our legal system, called the Common Law, from England.  It has long served us as the defender of our rights as Americans.   Among other things, it requires that we be tried by juries of our peers, that one should not be convicted of a crime if there exist a reasonable doubt of his guilty, that even in civil cases must be decided on the basis of law not merely fiat, and, yes, that everyone is entitled to an attorney even, again in criminal cases if the defendant can’t afford one, Consider what the United States might be like if the government could simply jail anyone it chose for any reason.  Russia?   China?  North Korea? 
- Advertisement -
         America should be grateful to its lawyers for many of the rights we enjoy even though they are not included in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.  The Right of Privacy, for example, was established   the   by superb lawyers who helped create the right by arguing inferences from the constitution where there was nothing explicit.  Thus the government is not supposed to snoop on us, it is not allowed to peak into our bedrooms and commercial interests may not use our pictures or endorsements without our consent.  Equal rights in school and elsewhere is largely the result of lawyers brave enough to take up, at the time, a very unpopular cause. 
  There are other examples.
          One of the most misunderstood aspects of lawyering is the assumption that what a lawyer says on behalf of a client represents his personal  views.   If, for example, in dealing with a school problem, the school’s solicitor should express the views of  school’s  administration or  board even though he personally may have  another view.  (I am not talking about the advice he gives to the board publicly or privately.)  Similarly, in a criminal case,  a lawyer  is entitled to maintain the innocence  of his client even though he may have doubts.  That guilt is to  be decided by  a jury, not the defendant’s lawyer,  and the lawyer should raise every point  that tends to create doubt even though  he has none.   The limit on this is only that  a lawyer may not make statements or  present testimony  that he knows to be false, emphasis “knows.”   
        Most lawyers  rarely appear in court.  They  advise clients on matters  of law,  laws  which are increasingly more complicated as our society becomes  more  complex.  Many serve as negotiators for their clients, an art  for which many are well trained.  It  is often said that the purpose of law schools  is not  to teach law, but rather to enable their students to think critically about law;  that is, to find the real issues. 
   That helps explain  why it is that lawyers often  find success  in business. 
  Some of them even become columnists in their old age.So, be kind to our legal eagles.   As is said of ducks, they may be somebody’s mother.  


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Walter Brasch is an award-winning journalist and professor of journalism emeritus. His current books are Before the First Snow: Stories from the Revolution , America's Unpatriotic Acts: The Federal Government's Violation of (more...)

Walter Brasch Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

Baffled, Befuddled, and Bamboozled: Penn State Trustees and NCAA are Sinking

Truckin' to Treason: The Hot Air of Secession

Former OEN Managing Editor Files Lawsuit Against Philly Police, City. Charge: Constitutional Violations in Her Arrest

Keystone XL, Through Transcanada, Uses Eminent Domain to Seize Texan's Land

Rush to Judgment: Talk Radio's 'Truth Detector' Blows a Fuse--Again