In a sensational and
explosive TV report, the Pakistani News Agency has provided a live interview
with an eye witness to the US attack on the alleged compound of Osama bin Laden.
The eye witness, Mohammad Bashir, describes the event as it unfolded. Of the
three helicopters, "there was only one that landed the men and came back to pick
them up, but as he [the helicopter] was picking them up, it blew away and caught
fire." The witness says that there were no survivors, just dead bodies and
pieces of bodies everywhere. "We saw the helicopter burning, we saw the dead
bodies, then everything was removed and now there is
I always wondered how a
helicopter could crash, as the White House reported, without at least producing
injuries. Yet, in the original White House story, the SEALs not only survived a
40-minute firefight with al Qaeda, "the most highly trained, most dangerous,
most vicious killers on the planet," without a scratch, but also survived a
helicopter crash without a scratch.
The Pakistani news report
is available on You Tube. The Internet site, Veterans Today, posted a translation along with a video of the interview. And, Information Clearing House
made it available on May 17.
If the interview is not a
hoax and the translation is correct, we now know the answer to the unasked
question: Why was there no White House ceremony with President Obama pinning
medals all over the heroic SEALs who tracked down and executed Public Enemy
The notion that Obama had
to keep the SEALs' identity secret in order to protect the SEALs from al Qaeda
detracts from the heroic tough-guy image of the SEALs, and it strains credulity
that Obama's political handlers would not have milked the occasion for all it is
Other than on the Veterans
Today and ICH Internet sites, I have not seen any mention of the Pakistani news
story. If the White House press corps is aware of the report, no one has asked
President Obama or his press spokesperson about it. Helen Thomas was the last
American reporter sufficiently brave to ask such a question, and she was
exterminated by the Israel Lobby.
In America we have reached
the point where anyone who tells the truth is dismissed as a "conspiracy
theorist" and marginalized. Recently, a professor of nano-chemistry from the
University of Copenhagen made a lecture tour of major Canadian universities
explaining the research, conducted by himself and a team of physicists and
engineers, that resulted in finding small particles of unreacted nano-thermite
in dust samples from the wreckage of the World Trade Center towers in addition
to other evidence that the professor and the research team regard as conclusive
scientific proof that the towers were brought down by controlled
- Advertisement -
No American university
dared to invite him, and as far as I know no mention of the explosive research
report has ever appeared in the American press.
I find it astonishing that
1,500 architects and engineers, who actually know something about buildings,
their construction, their strength and weaknesses, and who have repeatedly
requested a real investigation of the destruction of the three WTC buildings,
are regarded as conspiracy kooks by people who know nothing whatsoever about
architecture or engineering or buildings. The same goes for the large number of
pilots who question the flight maneuvers carried out during the attacks, and the
surviving firemen and "first responders" who report both hearing and personally
experiencing explosions in the towers, some of which occurred in
A large number of
high-ranking political figures abroad don't believe a word of the official 9/11
story. For example, the former president of Italy and dean of the Italian
Senate, told Italy's oldest newspaper, Corriere delia Sera, that the
intelligence services of Europe "know well that the disastrous [9/11] attack has
been planned and realized by the American CIA and the [Israeli] Mossad . . . in
order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the
western powers to take part in [the invasions].
Even people who report
that there are dissenting views, as I have done, are branded conspiracy
theorists and banned from the media. This extends into the Internet in addition
to newspapers and TV. Not long ago a reporter for the Internet site, The
Huffington Post, discovered that Pat Buchanan and I are critics of the Iraq and
Afghanistan invasions. He was fascinated that there were some Reagan
administration officials who dissented from the Republican Party's war position
and asked to interview me.
After he posted the
interview on The Huffington Post, someone told him that I was not sound on
9/11. In a panic the reporter contacted me, demanding to know if I disbelieved
the official 9/11 story. I replied that being neither architect, engineer,
physicist, chemist, pilot, nor firefighter, I had little to contribute to
understanding the event, but that I had reported that various experts had raised
The reporter was terrified
that he might somehow have given a 9/11 skeptic credibility and be fired for
interviewing me about my war views for The Huffington Post. He quickly added at
the beginning and, if memory serves, ending of the posted interview words to the
effect that my lack of soundness on 9/11 meant that my views on the wars could
be disregarded. If only he had known that I was unsure about the official 9/11
story, there would have been no interview.
One doesn't have to be a
scientist, architect, engineer, pilot or firefighter to notice astonishing
anomalies in the 9/11 story. Assume that the official story is correct and that
a band of terrorists outwitted not only the CIA and FBI, but also all 16 US
intelligence agencies and those of our NATO allies and Israel's notorious
Mossad, along with the National Security Council, NORAD, air traffic control and
airport security four times in one hour on the same morning. Accept that this
group of terrorists pulled off a feat worthy of a James Bond movie and delivered
a humiliating blow to the world's only superpower.
If something like this
really happened, would not the president, the Congress, and the media be
demanding to know how such an improbable thing could have happened?
Investigation and accountability would be the order of the day. Yet President
Bush and Vice President Cheney resisted the pleas and demands for an
investigation from the 9/11 families for one year, or was it two, before finally
appointing a non-expert committee of politicians to listen to whatever the
government chose to tell them. One of the politicians resigned from the
commission on the grounds that "the fix is in."
Even the two chairmen and
the chief legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission wrote books in which they stated
that they believe that members of the military and other parts of the government
lied to the commission and that the commission considered referring the matter
for investigation and prosecution.
Thomas Kean, chairman of
the 9/11 Commission, said: "FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11
that was untrue . . . We, to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they
told us . . . It was just so far from the truth."
Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton
said: "We had a very short time frame . . . we did not have enough money . . .
We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble
getting access to documents and to people. . . . So there were all kinds of
reasons we thought we were set up to fail."
As far as I know, not a
single member of the government or the media made an issue of why the military
would lie to the commission. This is another anomaly for which we have no
The greatest puzzle is the
conclusion drawn by a national audience from watching on their TV screens the
collapse of the WTC towers. Most seem satisfied that the towers fell down
as a result of structural damage inflicted by the airliners and from limited,
low-temperature fires. Yet what the images show is not buildings falling down,
but buildings blowing up. Buildings that are destroyed by fires and structural
damage do not disintegrate in 10 seconds or less into fine dust with massive
steel beams sliced at each floor level by high temperatures that building fires
cannot attain. It has never happened, and it never will.
Conduct an experiment.
Free your mind of the programmed explanation of the towers' destruction and try
to discern what your eyes are telling you as you watch the videos of the towers
that are available online. Is that the way buildings fall down from damage, or
is that the way buildings are brought down by explosives? Little doubt, many
Americans prefer the official story to the implications that follow from
concluding that the official story is untrue.
If reports are correct,
the US government has gone into the business of managing the public's
perceptions of news and events. Apparently, the Pentagon has implemented
Perception Management Psychological Operations. There are also reports that the
State Department and other government agencies use Facebook and Twitter to stir
up problems for the Syrian, Iranian, Russian, Chinese, and Venezuela governments
in efforts to unseat governments not controlled by Washington. In addition,
there are reports that both governments and private organizations employ
"trolls" to surf the Internet and to attempt to discredit in blogs and comment
sections reports and writers who are out of step with their interests. I believe
I have encountered trolls myself.
In addition to managing
our perceptions, much is simply never reported. On May 19, 2011, the
14-decade-old British newspaper, The Statesman, reported
that the Press Trust of India has reported that the Chinese government has warned Washington "in unequivocal terms that any attack on Pakistan would be construed as an attack on China," and advised the US government "to respect Pakistan's sovereignty."
As trends forecaster
Gerald Celente and I have warned, the warmongers in Washington are driving the
world toward World War III. Once a country is captured by its military/security
complex, the demand for profit drives the country deeper into war. Perhaps this
news report from India is a hoax, or perhaps the never-diligent mainstream media
will catch up with the news tomorrow, but so far this extraordinary warning from
China has not been reported in the US media. [I had it posted on
The mainstream media and a
significant portion of the Internet are content for our perceptions to be
managed by psy-ops and by non-reporting. This is why I wrote not long ago that
today Americans are living in George Orwell's