Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Have We Got Anything to Lose?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   6 comments
Author 74513
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bear Kosik
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Kamala Harris
Kamala Harris
(Image by Gage Skidmore)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

I read yet another essay by a Republican pleading with Democrats to run in 2020 without any progressive policies. The desire is to defeat Trump before he institutionalizes his warped understanding of governmental operations. The reasoning is that voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Florida who voted for Trump or stayed on the sidelines in 2016 will be scared off by "pie in the sky" options regarding healthcare, education, welfare, immigration, and housing.

If Republicans are that concerned about Trump, why are they not supporting a challenger? The Democrats allowed Ted Kennedy to run against a sitting president of their own party in 1980. Except almost all elected Republicans are doing whatever they can to allow Trump's policies and decisions ride, no matter how egregiously misinformed and malignant they are. Anyone who is surprised by the GOP following Trump in lockstep has not paid attention to how the GOP has managed its partisanship since 1994. These are the people who had no comment when it was discovered that George W. Bush's casus belli regarding Afghanistan and Iraq was grounded on lies.

Speaking of which, another one of those people who remained silent when OMDs were proven to be a hoax is Hilary Clinton. She literally traded her vote for the war against Iraq (i.e. support for having Americans go to their death) for money for the State of New York. Part of the argument in favor of ignoring the need for progressive policies is that the Democrats need an electable candidate to defeat Trump. Except they thought they had one in Clinton and she blew it. If Clinton couldn't beat Trump, what makes anyone think Joe Biden is going to be any better? His history of ignoring racists and being too physical around women blows away any chance of using those concerns against Trump.

- Advertisement -

What is most incomprehensible of all is that no one has learned from the mistakes Bernie Sanders made in 2016. He talked a good game about political revolution but was empty-handed when it came to explain just how that revolution was going to unfold other than electing him first.

If any of the Democratic candidates hopes to be elected, they must be explicit about how they are going to fund projects like Medicare for all and free college tuition before mentioning those two goals. They must call for a return to taxation levels last seen in 1970 (or 1960) when the government could provide grants to cities and sustain a social safety net. They must show an abiding concern for maintaining full employment through public works projects. They must have an answer to what to do with the crush of immigrants banging on our doors. They must stand against corporate welfare and any continued decline in middle income earnings compared to productivity gains. They must listen to the Defense Department's better lights who know their budget can be slashed without harming preparedness. They must demonstrate vigor and thoughtfulness in international affairs. They must remove partisanship from their vocabulary and speak as leaders of all of America. They must recognize that Trump's self-inflicted wounds will do the work for them and not bash the president on matters that are obviously absurd or horrifying.

In September 2015, I argued in my ruffbear7 Daily Kos blog why Donald Trump was going to become president if Hillary Clinton was the Democratic candidate. The full explanation is in Remaking Democracy in America. Despite acidic, venomous diatribes posted as comments to that piece, I was vindicated in November 2016. Not only was Trump elected, but he was elected for the reasons I had stated fourteen months earlier.

- Advertisement -

I will make another prediction. If Senator Kamala Harris does what is outlined in the preceding paragraph and becomes the Democratic nominee, she will defeat Trump in November 2020. Let the 2008 primary be a guide to how she will gain the nomination. She is Barack Obama in drag just like Hilary Clinton is Richard Nixon in drag.

Unfortunately, being a nobody writer with this as my only platform, Senator Harris is never going to know my advice. Bernie Sanders never read my advice that he needed an investigation of the DNC in February 2016 to find out what WikiLeaks proved in June 2016. By June it was all over for him. He never read my advice about forming a political organization to promote his revolutionary agenda even if he wasn't elected. If he had, the Squad might be supporting him now and he might have the endorsement of a few of the people now running against him in the primary field.

Have we got anything to lose? The Republican's pundit's concern was to prevent Trump's warped sense of government operations from becoming permanent. The fact is that his views are the same views put into practice by Ronald Reagan. The damage was done decades ago. The mistrust of government, the politicization of the Supreme Court, the aggressiveness of military policy, the shunning of redistributive tax structures, and the hyper-partisanship in Congress and statehouses were in place by 1988. Patrician George H. W. Bush was a brief throwback. But like most of the men with outstanding records in public service who lived in the White House (John and John Quincy Adams, William Howard Taft, and Herbert Hoover), his stay lasted only four years. Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich made certain that the Reagan Revolution would take hold.

That is why it is time for a political revolution, a new political system to emerge in this country that embraces the principles of democratic socialism, renounces saber-rattling, and stirs citizens to build nurturing communities. The Democratic candidate needs to demonstrate that change is possible and beneficial to everyone.

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Bear Kosik Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bear Kosik is a political scientist by training. His Remaking Democracy in America was published in the fall of 2018 by Stairway Press. Well-received science fiction novels (two under Hugh Dudley) are available on Amazon. Several screenplays (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Waiting in the Examining Room

Why Trump Is Succeeding (and will continue to do so)

The Occupy Movement Needs to Take the Next Step

Have We Got Anything to Lose?

Why Almost Everyone Was Wrong

My "Legal" Marriage: Now Define Excited

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   



You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.
Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments  Post Comment


Bear Kosik

Become a Fan
Author 74513
Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Dec 9, 2011), 7 fans, 26 articles, 97 comments, 5 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

To anyone who has a genuine sense of why Trump was elected, it is relatively easy to see what needs to be done to defeat him in 2020 and who needs to do it. Most pundits remain baffled by Trump's success because they don't take him seriously. That was Hilary Clinton's big mistake, too. Now the question is whether any of the Democratic candidates are going to learn from Bernie Sanders' mistakes (Bernie hasn't) and become a successful nominee and candidate.

Submitted on Friday, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:28:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

David William Pear

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 48 fans, 78 articles, 335 quicklinks, 3508 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Bear Kosik:   New Content

And what would that gain us? It would be George Bush's 5th and maybe 6th term. Or Obama's 3rd and maybe 4th. Just depends on how one looks at it.

Between Harris and Trump there is not much daylight between which is the least evil. An "Obama in drag" would put the final nail in the coffin of liberals, and blacks. The liberals wouldn't have a clue what was happening, and the blacks would keep their silence.

Submitted on Friday, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:59:45 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 
Indent

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 36 fans, 70 articles, 417 quicklinks, 5512 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Bear Kosik:   New Content

You are aware Trump ran more to the left than Hillary with more "pie in the sky". I guess with Harris being almost a duplicate of Hillary would be your ticket. Who is that said doing the same thing over, but expecting different results is insanity? That may well apply here.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:45:04 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 12 fans, 1819 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Bear,

You asked, "Have we got anything to lose?"

I would answer, "Not much; and we've already lost it."

To my mind, 3 major things: climate change (man-made or Mother Nature), the implementation of UN Agenda 2030 and the unbeatable rollout of 5G have already signed the fate for most of humanity.

We might be watching the wrong ball. While we quibble the micro, the macro moves inexorably forward.

This doesn't mean give up; it means, IMHO, do good as long and as best you can. (And keep smiling, the PTB don't like it very much) :)

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 13, 2019 at 1:30:03 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 

Dennis Kaiser

Become a Fan
Author 10174
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jan 22, 2008), 36 fans, 70 articles, 417 quicklinks, 5512 comments, 48 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Healthcare, education, welfare, housing, etc. are not "pie in the sky" they are real things that have been neglected while this nation continues its downward spiral to Third World status. It's time the people stand up for themselves as they have obviously been forgotten by their elected officials.

As long as the people have no choices other than the "lesser evil" things will continue as is and the people will continue to side into poverty.

Given a choice between Harris or Trump leaves only a choice for dishonesty, bullying, and nothing in sight for the majority. We know of Trump's relationship to truth and regard for we useless eaters and that is what makes Harris even scarier as much of what comes out of her mouth today isn't backed up by what she has said or done in the recent past.

Harris is not a challenger to Trump as she has the same qualities, therefore giving the voters no choice as to substance, merely a name. That substance is not good.

What ought to make one wary is how much Harris is being promoted by the Presstitute Media Propagandists who are ordered by their sugar daddies to promote or smear individuals who would best bid the needs of Big PhRMA, MIL, the oil industry, Wall Street, the insurance industry, etc. none of which is to the benefit of the average American citizen. A good rule is if the PMP is pushing that person, steer clear.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:37:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 70 fans, 339 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 16305 comments, 180 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Why are we even talking about anyone but Tulsi and Marianne? In addition to and directly related to climate change and nuclear war? Expose the other frauds, yes, ut always in the context of what the real goals are.

Submitted on Saturday, Jul 13, 2019 at 3:01:02 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment