Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Hack Of Cheaters Dating Site Demonstrates Problem With NSA SPying

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 7/23/15

Become a Fan
  (307 fans)
- Advertisement -

There are at least forty million Americans with secrets. This article will show how violation of the forty million's privacy (monitoring, metadata collection) by NSA, hackers, phone companies, Facebook, Google affects hundreds of millions of Americans directly and ALL Americans, indirectly.


AshleyMadison.com
(Image by AshleyMadison.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

A hacker group has hacked AshleyMadison.com the premier website for people who want to cheat on their spouse, according to KrebsOnSecurity, which claims that the site is visited by 37 million users. KrebsOnSecurity says "The still-unfolding leak could be quite damaging to some 37 million users of the hookup service, whose slogan is 'Life is short. Have an affair.'"

- Advertisement -

In May, CNN reported that millions of "members" of Adult Friend Finder also had their information hacked. They start the article saying,

" More than 3.5 million people's sexual preferences, fetishes and secrets have been exposed after dating site Adult FriendFinder was hacked."

The two hacks add up to close to forty million people-- many of them actively engaged in cheating on their spouses.

The numbers just start there. Let's say someone-- an NSA agent, Jack, a member of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, a phone company geek who hacks into meta-data records-- finds out Joe is on a cheating site.

- Advertisement -

But Jack's not interested in Joe. He's interested in Joe's brother Bill, who's running a government regulatory agency. Jack threatens to ruin Joe's marriage, tells him Joe will lose custody and visitation privileges to see his kids if he doesn't drop an investigation of a corporation, or an executive.

Doing the numbers, we add, for each cheater, siblings, spouses, friends, children-- we can even assume they are all good, kind people, who might succumb to the kinds of threats Jack makes. So, let's go with 1.5 siblings, 1 spouse, 2 children, three friends-- 7.5 people for each of the 40 million cheaters. That rounds out to about 300 million people at risk.

Many of those people might be among those who say they have no reason to worry about their privacy. They don't have secrets to protect. And that's true. Now the USA has about 330 million population. My numbers leave out 30 million. But there are millions of people who are either in jail or have been in jail, or who have been prosecuted. Say four million. Multiply by 7.5 and you get over 30 million.

Privacy is important even if you have no secrets and nothing to hide. You are part of a network of relationships. Everyone is. You are vulnerable to the threat which the effects of violation of privacy portends for people who hold secrets that could be damaging.

If you care about someone, no matter how unblemished your personal story is, you are vulnerable, because of your connections to others.

There's another argument. Recently, I wrote a short article, Snowden's Brilliant Answer to Those Who Say They Don't Need Privacy Right Because They Have Nothing To Hide, which cited his remark,

- Advertisement -
"People who say they don't care about privacy because they have got nothing to hide have not thought too deeply about these issues. What they are really saying is I do not care about this right. When you say I don't care about the right to privacy because I have nothing to hide, that is no different than saying I don't care about freedom of speech because I have nothing to say or freedom of the press because I have nothing to write."

What do you think? I think that people who think they don't need privacy are being naive.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

(more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver