I just received a mass mailing from Blue Green Alliance and I didn't like it at all. I've seen many organizations prey parasitically on protest marches. This sure likes the case.
You would think that Blue Green Alliance-- a blend of unions and Democrats and Environmental organizations-- would be a solid advocate for the big environmental issues-- tough regulation or outright banning of fracking, rejection of the XL pipeline.
Yet they endorse Democrats who don't embrace these fundamental positions.
Of course, Obama has enthusiastically embraced fracking and has appointed corporate people to key agencies-- people friendly to anti-environmental policies and regulations, and he has waffled on Keystone XL.
PopularResistance reported, last year:
On Oct. 17, Governor Jerry Brown is being given the Right Stuff environmental award by the Blue Green Alliance. Brown just gutted and signed SB4 which will ramp up fracking in the state. He has declared war on CEQA, the environmental review law that is our last resort against polluters. And he is pushing the $54 billion Orwellian named Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) known as the twin tunnels. This is really a corporate water grab for Big Ag and Big Oil that will actually destroy a valuable ecosystem, the largest estuary on the West Coast of the Americas. We need to show him that his record cannot be green washed by even the most well meaning organizations and that we demand a ban on fracking, the strengthening not gutting of CEQA and the withdrawal of the twin tunnels plan.
This is beyond disappointing. Bluegreen Alliance has shown that it is not pro-environment. It is pro-corporate-friendly Democrat.
On the other hand, EcoWatch put out this statement:
Americans Against Fracking , a coalition of more than 270 national and local groups opposed to hydraulic fracturing, held a media teleconference today to call on President Obama to ban fracking  in the lead up to the People's Climate March .
The press call highlighted a new report  by Food & Water Watch, The Urgent Case for a Ban on Fracking, providing a comprehensive compilation of research on the harmful effects of fracking. It makes the case that the huge amount of methane released during the fracking process traps 87 times more heat pound for pound than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period.
"Gas wells are like chimneys in the Earth and what they leak goes straight into our atmosphere," said Sandra Steingraber , science advisor to Americans Against Fracking, and national expert on climate change and scientist at Ithaca college. "Fracked gas wells leak heat-trapping methane into the atmosphere which cripples any chance we have to combat climate change--unless we halt fracking. We've underappreciated just how powerful a greenhouse gas methane is. That's why we're calling methane the new carbon dioxide."
Actor Mark Ruffalo , a longtime anti-fracking activist, joined a group of scientists and environmental leaders to launch the #DontFrackOurClimate campaign. The social media campaign is timed to hit ahead of the People's Climate March  on Sunday and UN Climate Summit  on Tuesday in New York City. The goal is to focus attention on methane as the new carbon dioxide.- Advertisement -
"The industry has successfully spun fracking as good for the climate, but the science shows it's anything but," said Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter . "If President Obama wants to be a leader in curbing the global climate crisis, he can't continue to ignore the climate-related effects of methane from fracked gas. The science"- is now clear that natural gas dependence causes much more global warming than previously thought."
Food & Water Watch initially called for a ban on fracking in 2011, arguing that it was unsafe. "Since then, scientists have published more than 150 studies that clarify what is known, and what remains unknown, about the risks and harms that fracking brings to communities--the water pollution, air pollution, climate pollution and earthquakes, as well as other drivers of economic and public health problems," says the report.
"Everything that comes before and after fracking is an opportunity for methane to be emitted," said Tony Ingraffea , scientist and engineer at Cornell University. "There is far more methane getting into the atmosphere than we thought and the impact of methane on climate change is much higher than we thought. We only have two decades before we reach our tipping point. If we don't halt the production of shale gas, and slow down the release of unburned methane, we'll be committing climate suicide."