Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Execution drug shortage? Nope-drug companies just don't want their products used to execute people

By       Message C. Hwang     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

With execution drug supplies and alternatives running out, states have come to rely largely on loopholes and secrecy to carry out executions by lethal injection.

State officials maintain that if they can just keep information about the drugs or their suppliers secret, they can ensure a steady supply of approved drugs.

- Advertisement -

Yet this just isn't true. In an op-ed published recently in the Los Angeles Times, Ty Alper, a clinical professor of law at UC Berkeley, reveals why shrouding the execution process in secrecy won't increase the availability of drugs for use in executions, writing: "the reason is simple:Drug companies don't want their products used to kill people."

In fact, drug companies - and their shareholders and customers - as Alper notes, have long objected to the use of their products in executions, which violates the companies' values and hurts their bottom lines.

From U.S. pharmaceutical manufacturer Hospira:

"Hospira provides these products because they improve or save lives and markets them solely for use as indicated on the product labeling," the company wrote. "As such, we do not support the use of any of our products in capital punishment procedures."
From the President of Danish Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Lundbeck:
"We urge you to discontinue the use of Nembutal [another anesthetic alternative] in the execution of prisoners in your state because it contradicts everything we are in business to do -- provide therapies that improve peoples lives."
Alper concludes, "Such statements show that corporate leaders are convinced that using their medical products to induce death does not comport with the mission or financial interests of their companies."

So 'shortages' aren't the real issue; drug companies just don't want their products used to execute people.

- Advertisement -

Read Ty Alper's full Op-Ed here: "Why the execution drug shortage won't go away"

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Christine Hwang is a recent graduate of American University.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Law Prof: State Secrecy Leads To Unsafe Lethal Injection Protocols and Botched Executions

Execution drug shortage? Nope-drug companies just don't want their products used to execute people

Expediency over Science: Oklahoma's Lethal Injection Protocol Reflects a Step Backwards

PA Death Penalty: Governor Has History, and Ben Franklin, on His Side

Former Judge: Racial Bias and Error Plague PA's Death Penalty

When the Man on Death Row is Also a Victim