Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   78 comments
Sci Tech

Everything Is Perfect

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ben Dench     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 5/26/09

- Advertisement -

Originally posted: http://bendench.blogspot.com/2009/05/everything-is-perfect.html

What does this mean?

 

- Advertisement -

Everything that exists is a perfect expression of those conditions that created it. To say that something is perfect is to say that it is without blemish. Likewise, to say that something is imperfect is to say that it contains a blemish of some kind. The concept of a blemish, in turn, requires some kind of criterion by which to judge any given thing in question. Normally people determine criteria subjectively. They set some sort of standard—without an objective base—and assert that things that fall within that standard are acceptable and things that fall outside that standard are unacceptable. If something includes within it some characteristic that falls outside of a standard a person has created, it is said by the person to contain a blemish and to be imperfect.

Objectively, however, everything is perfect. With any sort of ultimate criteria that exist, everything necessarily must comply. For example, if we were to grant that the laws of physics were ultimate principles—and I am not saying that they are, I am merely using this as an example—then everything would necessarily conform with those principles one hundred percent of the time. Yet notice that even if we were to encounter some kind of phenomenon that deviated from those principles we would not call the phenomenon imperfect—rather we would reassess our belief in the ultimate nature of whatever principle was here violated.

Likewise, were there any sort of God that could act as a set of ultimate criteria—and I define a God here as an entity both all powerful and all knowing—it would be impossible for anything to contradict that God’s will. Since by definition God is aware of all things and has control of all things, anything that occurs must occur either because that God desired it to occur specifically or because that God allowed it to occur. There is no other option. Any activity of free will would fall under the realm of things God allows. While it is the fall back position of many Christians (and Jews, and Muslims, etc) that free will allows us to assert imperfection in individuals created by God yet not assert imperfection in the creator, this is merely an attempt to escape the inescapable—that any God that is all powerful and all knowing is necessarily all responsible.

Whatever your thoughts about the nature of whatever ultimate criteria govern reality, however, it is clear that anything that occurs must fall within them and is thus perfect. We may say that we like something or do not like something, or that something is perfect or imperfect relative to some subjective standard we set up, but objectively everything is perfect. It cannot be otherwise. People may not like someone or something—they might not even like themselves—but this does not change the fact that they are perfect—one hundred percent perfect one hundred percent of the time. Ultimately speaking of course.

- Advertisement -

What does this NOT mean?

This does not mean that you cannot dislike or seek to change things. Your desires and preferences are themselves a perfect expression of the circumstances that created them. Everything is perfect. Distaste with the way things are and acting in such a way as to change them to your preferences is perfect.

“And life itself confided this secret to me: 'Behold,' it said, 'I am that which must always overcome itself.'”

In saying that “everything is perfect” I am arguing against the concept of sin, the idea of an ontological blemish. I am really saying that “nothing is imperfect,” which is the logical equivalent of “everything is perfect.”

By imperfect, I mean containing some ontological blemish. I would argue that all perceived blemishes are the result of subjective value judgments and do not map onto being itself. In that the concept of an ontological blemish is incoherent—that is to say, there is no such thing as an ontological blemish—then all things are without ontological blemishes and are thus perfect.

Once we clear the mind of the idea of ontological blemishes, however, we can begin to look at things pragmatically. We do not say, “This is right; this is wrong,” we say “I want this; I don’t want this.” If something happens that you don’t like, you don’t say, “It is evil,” you say, “This is the perfect expression of those conditions that created it—since I do not like it, how can I alter conditions so as not to reproduce it?” I think that this is a far more effective and accurate way to view the world. To seek to change things because you think something is wrong is to act out of need—to live your life reactively. To seek to change things because you want something different is to act out of desire—to live your life creatively.

Whatever else may be true ethically, sin is not something that can exist. Nothing can contradict the prime principle, of which it is a manifestation.

- Advertisement -
If you identify with the message of this article, please email it to people, tell your friends, even print out copies to pass around. Together we can raise awareness. Thank you.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://bendench.blogspot.com/
Ben Dench graduated valedictorian of his class from The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey in the Spring Semester of 2007 with a B.A. in philosophy (his graduation speech, which received high praise, is available on YouTube). He is currently (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Richard Carrier

The Origin of Hell

Violent Jesus

How We Know That Christianity Is Not True

The Origin of Satan

On Masochism