I was asked to be a co-host for a Webinar discussion by president of the Henry George School of Social Sciences in New York City, Andrew Mazzone on April 22, 2015. We discussed the views of Thomas Piketty, Yanis Varoufakis and Henry George on the economic issues of today. The Webinar lasted 2 hours and can be seen here:
The Mazzone/Baker Plan:
- Issue drachmas for local consumption and spending. The amount should be enough to meet the 30% Output Gap, but not enough to cause too much inflation; the problem now, of course, is rampant deflation caused by too little money in circulation.
- Agree to pay off the debt over 100 years, 1/100th per year. In reality, this will be the basis for negotiation, but it is a concrete one, something that has not been offered so far.
- Use the devalued currency to encourage cheap tourism to Greece and exports. Tourism growth estimates vary considerably but 16.7% is a good mid-range calculation in 2014, and tourism remains Greece's main economic engine, supporting 53 job categories.
- Tax the large landowners with a Land Value Tax. It turns out that the Greek Orthodox Church is the country's second largest land owner, after the government, but actually, this is imprecise, because in Greece, the church is part of the government, and its priests also collect a salary from government and the church owns stock in publicly traded companies like the Bank of Greece.
As preparation for the Webinar I re-watched the follow-up
interview Mazzone had with Varoufakis in which he discussed the recent
economics best-seller from Dr. Thomas Piketty: "Capital
in the 21 Century," just before Varoufakis was appointed Greece's Finance
Minister. Though Varoufakis is
probably, and understandably, too busy to have joined us for this Webinar on
Thomas Piketty, Mazzone and I met to discuss his views, our own interpretation
of Piketty's important work, and also to put it in contrast to the solutions
offered by Henry George, especially in his 1879 best-selling opus, Progress and
Poverty (see video above), while interacting with the students. Mazzone's second interview with
Varoufakis, discussing Piketty, can be found on the school's website, here: Smart
Talk with Andrew Mazzone and Dr. Yanis Varoufakis.
Varoufakis also wrote a review in 2014 of Thomas Piketty's book, in which he said:
The commercial and discursive triumph of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century symbolises this turning point in the public's mood both in the United States and in Europe. Capitalism is, suddenly, portrayed as the purveyor of intolerable inequality which destabilises liberal democracy and, in the limit, begets chaos. Dissident economists, who spent long years arguing in isolation against the trickle-down fantasy, are naturally tempted to welcome Professor Piketty's publishing phenomenon.
The sudden resurgence of the fundamental truth that the best predictor of socio-economic success is the success of one's parents, in contrast to the inanities of human capital models, is undoubtedly uplifting. Similarly with the air of disillusionment with mainstream economics' toleration of increasing inequality evident throughout Professor Piketty's book. And yet, despite the soothing effect of Professor Piketty's anti-inequality narrative, this paper will be arguing that Capital in the 21st Century constitutes a disservice to the cause of pragmatic egalitarianism.
Underpinning this controversial, and seemingly harsh, verdict, is the judgment that the book's:
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).