Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 57 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/13/14

Debating the Anarcho-Capitalists

By       (Page 1 of 8 pages)   2 comments, 3 series
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Scott Baker
Become a Fan
  (79 fans)

I don't normally reproduce comments and counter-arguments as articles, because they tend to be incoherent and hard to understand as standalone articles.   But, in this case, this article in the anarcho-capitalist Daily Bell Blog, when they took on her and her run for Treasurer in California, turned into something that seemed article-worthy.

Kindly Ellen Brown Dishes Out Snake Oil as She Runs for CA Treasurer

By Staff Report - January 29, 2014


My comments and the Daily Bell's (DB) counter-responses follow.   I think it is instructive to see how the anarcho-capitalist mind-set works.   Progressives can't ignore these people, as they facilitate the very worst in corporate-grabbing fascism, though they would venomously deny that, and actually make the counter-argument that it is progressives, with their support of the State - sometimes called by them, the Leviathan - that leads to corporatism (the term Mussolini said should have been used instead of fascism to describe the paradigm he founded).

Credit goes to Ellen Brown for bringing attention to this article in the Public Banking Google group, which I and several hundred other PB advocates participate in.   Some slight reformatting has been done to improve readability.   Additional comments by me will be in parentheses and italics.


Scott Baker

It's hard to know where to begin with this, as so many things are simply wrong. I'll try to list them:

1. Ellen Brown is not calling for money-printing by the State, at least not in advocating for STATE or municipal public banks (a number of us in the Public Banking Institute are advocating for large city or county level public banks too; hardly Big Government. See my presentation in Philadelphia for the PA chapter of PBI here:   Only the Federal government has the power to "coin Money" constitutionally, a fact which Brown is well aware of.

2. The parties who have been profligate with money-creation and fraud are in the private sector, albeit abetted by both the Federal Reserve and the government - both of which, I, and more importantly, many economists and government watchdogs, have observed to be bought out and corrupted (I believe DB and Brown are in agreement that Corporate Personhood ought to be repealed ASAP). I have argued elsewhere that having a Public Option for Money would provide some balance to having nearly all money produced in the private sector, as would LETS and as did U.S. Notes under Lincoln during the Civil War, when the private NYC banks (them again!) wanted to bankrupt the North with 24-36% interest rates - hardly banks operating in the Public Interest (pun intended)!

3. DB's solution: "The solution is a simple one, however. People need to educate
themselves, take responsibility for their actions and also take "human
action" to support themselves, their families and their communities in
ways that provide self-sufficiency." would be laughably naive if it wasn't so dangerous. The fact is only a strong government with regulation that works (see Bill Black) can counter the oligopoly that is the current Big Banking system. It hasn't done so not because Government is too big and powerful, but because it is too small and weak, compared to the Banking-industrial complex. Brown is trying to provide a counterbalance to both the self-seeking private sector and ineffectual Washington Government (which she has said repeatedly cannot be counted on to pass anything meaningful in the present polarized environment - a fact with which Americans overwhelmingly agree, as indicated by persistent disapproval ratings of both executive and legislative branches). She is doing so by promoting Public Banking at the State, Regional and even, where it makes sense, city and town level (obviously, there is a point where economies of scale argue against Public Banking, but I just completed a preliminary analysis on little Luzerne County, PA for the Pennsylvania chapter of PBI, and haven't reached that point yet).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 2   Supported 2   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Baker Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a former blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles "America is Not Broke" was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (March, 2015) and may be found here:

Scott is a former and current President of Common Ground-NY (, a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written dozens of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

Detroit is Not Broke!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend