Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 27 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/29/12


By       (Page 1 of 4 pages)   5 comments
Become a Fan
  (48 fans)

Grover Norquist's no-new-taxes pledge (the "Norquist Pledge") that he demanded of conservative legislators has become a weapon of mass destruction. The American economy now suffers from the burden of unsustainable cumulative debt and the shredding of the social contract  because the fiscal terrorists of the right refuse to require the rich to pay their fair share of the cost of sustaining a viable, compassionate, humane society. 

In addition to the imposed fiscal conservatism of the Norquist blackmail, there is a second pledge, the "silent pledge," allowing big money to trump voter preferences in determining national policy. We see this in the deluge of dollars flowing into Washington via lobbyists, campaign contributions, PACs and SuperPACS that have drowned out the legitimate voice of the common citizen.

I suggest that we can the Norquist Pledge and the "silent pledge" to an opposite effect; that is, as a means of restoring sanity in the legislative branch of government. This coming election provides the necessary and pivotal opportunity to confront our representatives and deliver an ultimatum, an ultimatum in the form of a new kind of pledge, one that hasn't been seen is a while -- a pledge to do the right thing. Or else!

The Idea

We put it in writing. It takes the form of a candidate pledge to decisively and unambiguously undertake certain initiatives in Congress on a particular issue. There are specific directions to implement a policy supported by a large majority of American voters. We force candidates to sign the pledge. If they do, we're in. We get the legislation we want. If they refuse, we humiliate them, harass them, jeopardize their support, attempt to defeat them. We brook no compromise. We accept no excuses. We leave no room for equivocation. 

For this to work, the pledges must cover those issues where the voting public by vast majorities have indicated precisely what they want done: Social Security, taxes on the rich, the war in Afghanistan, oil industry subsidies, Medicare. Frankly, it is appalling how many important issues the public has in credible polls indicated unambiguously where they stand only to have our politicians defy them.  

Every candidate should be required to sign the pledges. This would put the control of voting on these critical items directly back in the hands of voters.

Realistically this is impossible. There simply is not enough time. So for now, it is more important to target incumbents, specifically those incumbents who have voted against enormously popular measures. Conveniently, via their voting records, they have handed us the ammunition we need to force their hands. These are the arrogant scoundrels who have brazenly sold the American public and their constituents down the river. They have bowed to their rich campaign donors and blown off the rest of us as irrelevant. 

These are the ones we go after. They are the ones we need to either turn around or send packing.  

Let me point out that this kind of precise targeting is exactly the way the right wing goes about decimating the ranks of progressives. It obviously works. Time to turn the tables. 

Step 1:   Petitions

The process starts with petitions, i. e. canvassing within a particular voting district, or state if the incumbent at issue is a senator, for hard evidence of the level of public support for the initiatives we want to see passed.

Here is a sample petition, the suggested format for canvassing on any issue: 

I am a registered voter and will only vote for a candidate for public office who will leave social security alone. If a candidate guarantees unequivocally to fight for keeping social security as it currently stands, I will give that candidate my unqualified support. 

Obviously, the petition is more of a statement of support for a specific policy position than an actual petition for some action. But it accomplishes precisely what's needed here. 

In fact, the petitions are the linchpin for the assault on these scoundrels. They provide the leverage needed to get the attention of candidates and make them an offer they can't refuse. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

John Rachel Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Rachel has a B.A. in Philosophy, and has written eight novels and three political non-fiction books. His political articles have appeared at OpEdNews, Russia Insider, The Greanville Post, and other alternative media outlets. Since (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Be Afraid ... Be Very Afraid!

Obama Surrounds Himself With Neocons and Other Hawkish Lunatics

Trump's Gone Too Far This Time!

Freedom of the Press

Isn't it Time to Stop America's Ugly Game of Thrones Business?

Ten Commandments For A New American Century

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend