Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 25 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/20/12

Bush v. Gore has lessons for us; Read Health Decision

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

By Robert S. Weiner and Richard Mann
Originally published in the Miami Herald

   The biggest mistake Al Gore made was caving on the election in Florida when he didn't have to. The Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore on Dec. 12, 2000 didn't say "abort," it said, "remanded for further proceedings" back to Florida to establish a consistent statewide recount.

   Florida's Supreme Court had supported Gore three times already in the election's decisions. Gore had an excellent opportunity if he asked for a full recount. The U.S. Supreme Court simply didn't want the campaigns to cherry-pick the counties.

   Twenty states had later election certifications, so Gore could have also requested an extension of time. Yet, he gave up overall. He clearly didn't take into account the harm that eventually would be done by a Bush presidency. Had Gore persisted and won, we may still have had the Clinton-Gore surpluses. There wouldn't have been the Bush tax breaks, including for the rich, or the second war in Iraq. Gore opposed both, and they are two-thirds of the deficit. Because the United States is the world's economic leader, the entire world might not be in the economic mess that it's in now.

   The lesson of the missed interpretation of Bush v. Gore should be applied to every Supreme Court ruling: Read the decision.

   With the upcoming decision on the Affordable Health Care Act, expected in days, the outcome may differ wildly from the media interpretations. There could be no -- or partial or full -- repeal of the bill. Provisions covering preexisting conditions, preventive care including mammograms and colonoscopies, seniors' drugs, children on parents' plans through age 26, no lifetime caps and requiring 80 percent of benefits to go to patients, not administrators, could be kept or thrown out. The Medicaid expansion to 30 million new beneficiaries could be kept, under Congressional prerogative, or thrown out. The whole bill could be sustained, guaranteeing healthcare under the general welfare clause, or thrown out as an infringement of individual rights.

   Lesson to us all: Read the decision, not just the media commentaries. Then, tell the political leaders what you think. But let's work from the facts.

Robert Weiner, president, and Richard Mann, senior policy analyst, Robert Weiner Associates, Washington, D.C.
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Bad money vs. bad money -- how Denver ballot measure could be blueprint for getting money out of politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend