Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/8/12

Beasts Lurking in the Shadows

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
(# of views)   No comments
Author 15597
Message Bob Alexander

Copyrighted Image? DMCA
br /> I don't care that the retail Christmas season starts earlier and earlier every year. I'm almost continually freaked out that Halloween hasn't stopped since December 12, 2000. It's like we're all living in a demented version of the film, Groundhog Day. The alarm goes off, we get up, and something horrible happens. All day long we wish we could change something but the next morning ... the alarm goes off, we get up, and something horrible happens.

It's Kafka's world ... we just live in it. With a little bit of H.P. Lovecraft thrown in to ramp up the creep factor.

We can all remember how much fun it was watching the National Defense Authorization Act creep through both Houses of Congress, hoping against hope that Obama wouldn't sign the goddamn piece of paper that would invalidate our Constitution. But he did. Then to prove he wasn't an extreme Fascist, he added that he probably wouldn't use the law he just signed into being. But regardless ... it's there lurking in the shadows waiting ... waiting.

The alarm goes off, we get up, and something horrible happens.

H.R. 347: Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011

It was introduced on January 19, 2011. This bill, with changes, passed in the Senate by unanimous Consent on February 6, 2012. The bill passed in the House of Representatives by roll call vote on February 28, 2011. The vote was held under a suspension of the rules to cut debate short and pass the bill, needing a two-thirds majority. This usually occurs for non-controversial legislation. The totals were 399 Ayes, 3 Nays, and 30 Present/Not Voting. H.R. 347 was presented to the President on Mar 1, 2012. He hasn't signed it ... yet.

The Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 has nothing to do with fertilizer, mulching, or upgrading the national fleet of lawn mowers.

How to describe this noisome sludge awaiting Obama's signature? John Robb from Global Guerrillas said it best:
"HR 347: One more step towards Neo-Feudalism

"In feudal times, you could be put to death if you didn't kneel when the carriages of the nobility passed by. This is a step in that direction (although very few people care).

"I'm not that excited to write about this type of thing. Seems like more of a chore than something I want to do. Why do I write about it? It's another milestone on the decline of the US that is worth highlighting for future historians.

"I can see these future historians now: poring over the output of software systems that cull trends from massive social media (Facebook, Twitter, blogs, etc.) repositories. Some will be shaking their heads, asking themselves: what were those numbskulls in the early 21st Century thinking about when their governments began to hollow out? Why were they so passive as things began to fall apart?

"This new bill, about to be signed by the President, is called the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. It is not as innocent as its name.

"Essentially, it makes it a federal offense to be anywhere near ... "somebody protected by the secret service. That's from the President to candidates for political office (Romney or Santorum) to senior government officials to foreign dignitaries (G20). In other words, lots and lots of people.

"While being sold as a way to close a loophole in the current law regarding White House security, it is actually much more than that. It changed one word that made a world of difference. What's the difference?

"To be arrested and imprisoned, all you need to do is be in the same building or area around a person that has secret service protection. You don't even need to know you are breaking the law to be arrested and imprisoned. If you are merely walking in an area 'secured' for a person being protected, you can be legally jailed for up to one year. If you are carrying something that can be seen as a weapon (legally or not), that imprisonment can be extended to ten years.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Bob Alexander Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I haven't moved my political point of view ... ever. Right smack in the Middle of the Road. But everything has shifted so far to the Right now Bill O'Reilly thinks I'm of the Far Left.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Designed To Fail

We Are Already Where We Were Afraid We Would Be

Reflecting upon The Walking Dead

There is No Joy in Muddville

Nowhere Near the Road to Damascus

Vu Zjahday: Opposite of Deja Vu -- The Sense You've Never Been Somewhere Before

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: