Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Amend the US Constitution: Individual Person Hood is an inalienable Right; Vigil at US Supreme Court

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages)   No comments
Message Radh Achuthan
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
We confront losses while we are simply coping within our skins with daily chores; today, almost two billion porous minds selectively associate on the Internet, and some would engage and organize consciousness therein at an inclusive, comprehensive level to challenge the problems that come our way...
The recent US Supreme Court Ruling Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission made provision for unlimited corporate funding of federal campaigns, and extended additional First Amendment political rights to corporations, encroaching on the social and political 'person hood' reserved for human beings.
The Ruling calls for a principled non-violent stand from the American Public on the implied devaluation of human status in the controlling documents of USA that would eventually affect all human beings.

Comment:

The US Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the US Constitution as it stands at any given time.

As social and political personhood is reserved for the natural human entity to be exercised during his/her brief, spiritual, variable capacity lifetime, with 'artificial collectives' (secular or otherwise) playing a supportive role, the above inventive 5-4 judicial ruling leads to alienation of human beings; a setback for current human existence and its potential.

Was personhood meant for human creations such as 'corporations' that are designed in haste and have evolved over a few centuries to have continual rejuvenation and the provision for perpetual existence?

The ruling dilutes the comprehensive political assignment granted with protections to the person by the US Constitution to formulate and guide the future of local human society (in the global village), as it enables competition and incursion by 'non-human' corporations over human futures.

And since money is required for practical politics of which a person could have but little while corporations have much at any given time, the ruling corrupts the political process through identity theft.

Individuals serve in the defense forces to protect their nation and Constitution, while corporations take a pass and 'in-source' the benefits reaped.

The ruling could be rectified through legislation by Congress; but such rectification would be subject to counter legislation by other Congresses, and probable repetitions of the cycle.

To ensure greater stability, a Constitutional Amendment is necessary and the process would take several years.

Emergence of the opportunity for the amendment in question, opens a Pandora's box for money power: after hearings, the amendments would be formulated and debated in Congress and massaged pro and con, loud and calm, by the media.

As there is 'that of God in each human being' and it is outside the reach of human designers to endow corporations with such content, it is necessary to have a 'principled non-violent' vigil on the contextual truth: that status of Human Identity (personhood as above), may not be tampered with by any institution; it is to be safeguarded as a standard for the foreseeable future in the US Constitution.

In admitting corporations to personhood the State exercises a power it does not have; that no human being has.

1. Confronted with the practice of violence in society by "threat power"*, (political power), human Conscientious Objection, CO, is essential when we wage war.

Vigilant human CO is also essential when we are confronted with encroachments during times of relative peace in society, to safeguard the participation of the people in "integrative power"*, (social power).

Due to the ineffective utilization of peacetime CO through history, 5% of the global population now own 80% of global resources denying the 'birth freedoms' and 'earth rights' of other human beings.

The global elite 5% have introduced and sustained 'private banking,' leading to the formation of corporations and the military-industrial complex, requiring a segment of society to exercise 'exclusion morality' ('for me but not for you'), and artificial separations, that are maintained through 'law and order' and State violence, when considered necessary.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Radh Achuthan Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Our top priority must be to realize non-violently Article 3 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those of the First World population have realized Article 3 for themselves and reciprocity is a productive, healthy guideline; so, let's (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Peace treaty between Israel and Palestine

Meet the Minimum Needs of All, (MMNA)- Intention: WEBINAR

GEONOMICS: Meet the Minimum Needs of All (MMNA)

A Cold Case: Spiritual Norms and Universal Human Rights

United Nations General Assembly Vote on Israel / USA.

Amend the US Constitution: Individual Person Hood is an inalienable Right; Vigil at US Supreme Court

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend