Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 2/8/20

A modest proposal for the settlements on the Israeli West Bank

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Scott Baker
Become a Fan
  (81 fans)

(Article originally published here on August 20, 2009)


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

I wrote the article below in 2009, when I was newly writing for Opednews (Much later, a couple of promotions turned me from writer to Managing Editor/Economics Editor).

With the new Trump "Peace Plan" I thought it worth revisiting and expanding upon the article, particularly in light of reviews of the Peace Plan like this one in Opednews.

First, the old article:


Israel, whether it chooses to acknowledge it or not (or we do), is heading toward a one-state solution.

So, knowing that, and believing, as I do, in turning a problem into a solution, I propose the following:
Keep the settlements, but - after thorough screening and background checks - allow one third of the new apartments to go to Palestinian families (the apartments must be of equal quality). If the Palestinian families don't have the money, I think the U.S. or international community could be persuaded to cough it up in the interest of peace and interdependency. We've certainly subsidized lesser causes.

I've long thought a two-state solution - with "Palestine" bifurcated down the middle by their hated Israel, was a geopolitical impossibility. By forcing these two people's to live together, at least those who are realistic, with a common interest in their mutual housing and environs, both people would be moving toward the inevitable co-mingling of their populations.

I think two-state proposals are disingenuous at best - from the Israeli side they are a delaying tactic, since the concessions necessary for co-existence, including disarmament, will never be met; from the Palestinian side they are a part of a strategy of slowly, inexorably, pushing Israel into the sea - I've never heard any credible proposal as to how a Palestinian state (let alone one as divided as Gaza and the West Bank are now) would be run.

If one had a magic box, and could place all hatred and feelings of vengeance inside it from both sides, there would still be enormous logistical challenges as to how to live in a parched, crowded, economically disparate region. The first thing a logical body politic would do is to tear down the wall, then they would improve the transportation and infrastructure. This is an interesting thought-experiment and one both sides should consider, if just to sober themselves up to the honest realities of the situation.

Of course, they won't. None of this will happen while each side is at each other's throat. But, by sharing their neighborhood, a lot could be accomplished. If the Israeli settlers just can't bear to live with ANY Palestinians, they should be moved to Israel proper, willingly or not.

It is time for new solutions. The road map was a dead-end. The Two-State solution is a geopolitical impossibility. The annihilation of Israel is in no one's interest, not even the Arabs, who would then have to contend with thousands of suddenly unemployed terrorists (more likely, Europe would, as that would be their next logical stop to recreate their Caliphate - this has been spoken of by Muslim leaders many times). Obviously, the fourth-world existence of the Gazans and that of their slightly better-off but impatient third-world cousins in the West Bank cannot continue. Obama promised change, but lofty speeches have to be backed up by a concrete plan.

Now that Trump, seemingly largely at Netanyahu's request, has carved up Samaria/Judea (aka the West Bank since 1967) into Rube Goldberg's version of Landed Territory, it's worth revisiting the idea of a Single State for everyone.

First, and very disappointingly, the Trump plan is not that. It is again the tired and 3/4 century failed idea of a Two-State solution. It's worth asking what other failed ideas have continued to be held for over 70 years? What do people still believe is possible after 70 years of failure? Technology advances. Geography does not.

Second, every major candidate, in every political party, reflexively still believes in a two state solution. This is magical thinking, as if making official borders will erase all the antagonisms (see above, but oh, so much more).

Israel could absorb the current Palestinian occupants of the so-called West Bank, divided into Area A, B, and C - C is already majority Israeli, so might be the most "digestible" piece. In contrast to the Trump plan, which is a form of apartheidism, the One State solution increases diversity, grants more rights to Palestinians, while still preserving most of the majority of Jews in the Jewish State. Both sides have to give up something: The stateless Palestinians have to give up the idea of a separate State, Israelis have to lessen their majority (Gaza stays apart, for now, maybe forever, or becomes part of Egypt, which doesn't want it either; this is for another discussion).

The Israeli America-educated journalist, Carolyn Glick, points out in her book, The Israel Solution, that the count of Palestinians in Judea/Samaria is a good deal less than either side claims. Double-counting, inflated estimates and projections based on unrealistic fertility rates, and even under-counting of Israeli Jews has led to a lopsided count and fear of the Palestinian Demographic "Time Bomb" that will threaten the Jewish State. This is not a problem, certainly not if the West Bank is absorbed in pieces.

Life for Palestinians who are citizens of Israel may not be great, but it is much better than for Palestinians who are not Israeli citizens - the very real threat "according to figures published by Peace Now this week, (since) some 380,000 Palestinians 260,000 in the Triangle and a further 120,000 in East Jerusalem (who) would be "swapped out" to a Palestinian state." What the Cook article fails to mention is that "327,070 Palestinians (would) officially be brought under Israeli sovereignty - 107,070 (West Bank) + 220,000 (East Jerusalem)" so it is a wash population-wise with those who would be subject to "Static Transfer" - the process of changing the state of a people still living in the same place, a violation of the 4th Geneva Convention and morally wrong.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 1   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Baker Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles "America is Not Broke" was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (March, 2015) and may be found here:
http://www.americaisnotbroke.net/

Scott is a former President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written dozens of articles for (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

Detroit is Not Broke!

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments  Post Comment


Kenneth Lee

Become a Fan
Author 6860
(Member since Jul 8, 2007), 3 fans, 6 articles, 1 quicklinks, 309 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I just wish people would stop using the word "settlement" to describe an area stolen from one people and forcibly occupied by another.

Submitted on Sunday, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:33:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 2 fans, 1 quicklinks, 345 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I was musing about this on another page in a much less knowledgeable way, but I think going in the same direction: if a two-state solution is improbable, maybe it's best to let a one-state solution start to happen. Although this Netanyahu-Kushner plan pretends to be two-state, it's really one-state with some fig leaf covers, because the Palestinian "state" would have no borders or foreign policy or other characteristics of an independent state. Lacking in democracy or much other present benefit for Palestinians, perhaps it would still be better to let it happen and then try to help democratize it. Since it doesn't matter much what any of us think in terms of what is actually going to take place, I'm talking more about what attitude to take to the "peace plan", that maybe it's better not to invest a lot of emotion in railing against a fate that seems like it could eventually lead to some sort of progress. That is, there doesn't seem to be much chance of a real two-state division, and there also doesn't seem to be much likelihood that anyone with the power to make change, e.g., the Israeli government or people or the US government or people, will at present enact a just one-state, so maybe it just needs to go ahead towards some one-state solution with poor rights for Palestinians and hope the future can be made better.

That's probably not exactly your point, but am I in the ball park of what you said?

Submitted on Sunday, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:05:48 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Scott Baker

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Oct 25, 2008), 81 fans, 288 articles, 1241 quicklinks, 3404 comments, 38 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram Page

Reply to Fred W:   New Content

Yes, I think that's right; one state for everyone, with equal rights for all, while still maintaining the Jewish State, though admittedly, that takes some more thought and discussion.

Being Jewish is more than a religion, it is an identity. In a recent Gallup poll, 50% of all Jews questioned the existence of God. It was less than 10% for Christians, and probably half that for Muslims if it had been asked.

Therefore, it's possible to create a secular Jewish State, I think, though it won't be easy.

Meanwhile, Palestinian Israelis are much better off then Palestinians who are not Israeli. I think it would be even better for them if the constant war was interrupted. It's at least worth trying and a two state solution won't get them there, it'll just cement the violence.

Submitted on Monday, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:34:13 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment