Paglia is a baby boomer, but Ong was not a baby boomer. I guess that many baby boomers saw him as part of the older male establishment that they were rebelling against.
But what about all those men who were too timid to challenge publicly the anti-male views of certain brash feminists? Couldn't they rally around Ong's defense of the spirit of male agonistic tendencies?
Finally, what about Paglia herself -- couldn't she strengthen her own warrior contributions to this ongoing debate by studying Ong's books and articles about male agonistic behavior?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).