But, it was this point which backs up my original column stating that many of us are not experts in the field of demolition and fire dispersal, “What I encourage people to do is go out and research it themselves. We don't ever come out and say that everything we say is 100 percent. We know there are errors in the documentary, and we've actually left them in there so that people discredit us and do the research for themselves -- the B52 (remarked to have flown into the Empire State Building), the use of Wikipedia, things like that. We left them in there so people will want to discredit us and go out and research the events yourself and come up with your own conclusions.”
In this Popular Mechanics pod cast debunking 9/11 theories, you will hear in that pod-cast, often those who write of these theories will quote someone who has written of it without going back to the original source. In a court of law it is called hear say which is often not entered as evidence.
Now I will address controlled demolitions. I do have a source within the company Controlled Demolitions Incorporated who I have been emailing with for quite sometime. I have always had the utmost respect for this company and the family that started this business years ago. In fact, I would call them experts in this field since they know how to take a building down safely and in a controlled environment. One person posted years ago that Controlled Demolitions Incorporated was in on it. My reaction to that post was; where is your proof? None was forth coming. You just do not make a statement like that without backing it up with proof. My source once said to me that any comment they make, is “often twisted” and they have had to resort to putting out a comment of “no comment” I do not blame them since I can feel their exasperation as my source told me of when confronting those who wish to believe the opposite.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).