Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
Sci Tech    H3'ed 8/2/25
  

The Titan Submersible Blew Apart in an Explosion Before Partial Crushing - A Fight Against Public Opinion

By       (Page 5 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow
Message Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow

7) Explosive pressure waves pushed the hull outward. An engineering approximation is that a maximum blast equaled 2 tons of TNT, where conventional bombs for warfare range between 1 and 44 tons (wikipedia.org/wiki/TNT_equivalent), and above ground explosion blast videos are available (.youtube.com/watch?v=R2ZjMfw_6X8). Even so, most of the potential Titan explosive pressure was released from the Titan hull as the dome blew off the Titan. There were certainly sufficient explosive forces to explain the shooting of hull pieces to large distances from the sub. Plastic deformations during an implosion does not explain blasted hull sections.

8) Some parts of the hull were blasted hundreds of feet away from the body of the submersible, i.e., Titan Submersible parts were recovered from a debris field that spread for a distance of about 1100 feet, almost the length of four football fields (Figure 14, click here).

Figure 14. Titan debris field.
Figure 14. Titan debris field.
(Image by Pelagic Research Services, LLC)
  Details   DMCA

9) For piece A, shown in Figure 5, the inner Layer 1 is shown to be perpendicular to the titanium ring indicating elastic deformation of that layer back to its original position. The other layers were plastically deformed outward. These deformations are consistent with a hull explosion, not ahull implosion.

10) Hull sections, B through D, that were still attached to the aft retaining ring, were then blasted inward from the force of the incoming water pressure, which entered the hull interior.

11) The percentage of hull surface accumulated at the aft section was not noted in NTSB reports.

12) The ferocity of this explosion was demonstrated by the fact that lead from the ballast weights was imbedded in the 61-inch analyzed section that was found 350 feet away from the vessel body (Figure 15). This one-inch thick layer was the innermost of five layers that were penetrated by the external lead weights as the hull burst outward.

13) Spalling removes adhesive and rubbing damages adhesive during shearing of the layers as they rip apart (Figure 16).

Figure 15. Lead embedment in an inner layer of the hull.
Figure 15. Lead embedment in an inner layer of the hull.
(Image by NTSB)
  Details   DMCA

Comparisons Between a Hull Implosion or a Hull Explosion

Comparisons of different technical issues in Table 1 conclude that a hull explosion explains all issues but a hull implosion does not. Most issues are discussed above. Three cases are considered: a) Viewport implosion and major hull explosion. b) Hull or adhesive failure and c) Major implosion only caused by adhesive or hull failures. Other issues follow.

1) Slant fractures can occur for any case due to complex bending and tension for each case (Figure 17). The test piece inner layer of the hull was crushed on the inside wall and stretched in the hoop direction around the circumference of the hull for an explosion.

2) Earlier work showed that recorded data during the explosions clearly proved that there were two distinct pairs of shock wave events that were consistent with explosion theory (Figure 18, click here). At the time of the explosion, a bang was heard on the support ship, and acoustic measurements were received 900 miles away in 16 minutes, which accounted for the speed of sound in water. As the first blast event unfolded, smaller shock waves are seen in the data, which were created when the viewport cracked and burst to create subsequent blast waves that bounced off the people and equipment in the Titan. In between the viewport implosion and the hull explosion, shock waves bounced back and forth inside the sub. During the explosion, shock waves bounced all over the sub, between the bursting parts, and off the ocean floor and water surface. Also following the explosion, pieces of the Titan crashed into the ocean floor to create additional sound waves. This analysis is the first scientific explanation, anywhere, of exactly how to interpret the acoustic measurements at the time of the 'Titan explosion'. This discussion debunks the 'implosion myth' of crushing the hull as a singular event without shock waves.

3) Hull pressures are higher at the forward dome for explosion conditions than for implosion conditions.

Figure 16. Spalling and rubbing of adhesive between layers on the 61-inch test piece.
Figure 16. Spalling and rubbing of adhesive between layers on the 61-inch test piece.
(Image by NTSB)
  Details   DMCA

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, P.E., PMP, ASME Fellow, Who's Who in America Top Engineer, Who's Who Millennium Magazine cover story, NACE Senior Corrosion Technologist, NACE Senior Internal Piping Corrosion Technologist, ANSYS Expert, AMPP Certified (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Book Publisher Wanted for a New Book, "Industrial Murder for Profit"

The Global Warming Fallacy, Polar Warming, Energy Use, and Continental Shifts

More Exposure Of The Fukushima Explosion Cover-up - Stop The Next Nuclear Power Plant Explosion

Are the 737 Jets Safe for Return to Our Skies?

The IAEA Again Thwarts Nuclear Safety to Risk a Zaporizhzhia Explosion Disaster

The CDC Blames Workers for Food Poisonings to Cover-up Their Incompetence

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend