Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
Sci Tech    H3'ed 8/2/25
  

The Titan Submersible Blew Apart in an Explosion Before Partial Crushing - A Fight Against Public Opinion

By       (Page 2 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow
Message Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow

Figure 1. Titan submarine, basic design.
Figure 1. Titan submarine, basic design.
(Image by OceanGate)
  Details   DMCA

Conclusive Explosion Evidence

Of primary importance to my implosion-explosion conclusions, the NTSB reported that ''The titanium segments [or rings]' 'were slightly ovalized. The top and bottom of each segment had deformed radially outward and the port and starboard sides had deformed radially inward' ("Titan Submersible Marine Board of Investigation, Materials - Group Chair's Factual Report 24-011", a.ntsb.gov/Docket/?NTSBNumber=DCA23FM036). That is, the titanium rings at each end of the carbon fiber hull were ovalized. Such ovalization had to have formed due to the ovalization of the hull as the hull violently ruptured. From Figure 2, the forces from the structural supports oppose the pressure forces assumed to act on the hull. If the hull initially imploded the titanium rings would have deflected inward at the top and bottom, which was not the case - and if the hull initially exploded the titanium rings would have deflected upward at the top and bottom, which was the case. That is, the observed bending of the titanium rings prove that a viewport explosion did, in fact, blow the Titan hull into pieces.

Figure 2. Comparison of actual explosion hull deformation to theoretical hull implosion.
Figure 2. Comparison of actual explosion hull deformation to theoretical hull implosion.
(Image by Leishear Engineering, LLC)
  Details   DMCA

Additional Test Data

The NTSB performed extensive analysis, and some of their data is provided here. ("Titan Submersible Marine Board of Investigation, Materials - Group Chair's Factual Report 24-011 and 24-012", a.ntsb.gov/Docket/?NTSBNumber=DCA23FM036).

Pilot Scale Testing

A pilot scale test and fatigue tests were not performed for the final Titan hull, but one-third-scale pressure tests for earlier Titan designs confirmed an implosion-explosion event (Figure 3). This small-scale test was not fully representative of the final Titan disaster, but clearly demonstrated that implosion-preceding-explosion events are possible for small underwater vessels.

Figure 3. Titan pilot scale testing
Figure 3. Titan pilot scale testing
(Image by OceanGate)
  Details   DMCA

Prior Hull Banging Noises

In an earlier dive (dive 80), 'an audible 'loud bang' was heard' on the Titan. The NTSB noted that strain measurements on the hull changed during and after that dive, during that bang (Figure 4). However, the Coast Guard's chief investigator for the disaster did make such a claim when he stated that 'additional f4bers were breaking after dive 80' [of 88] 'It is really, in my mind, the smoking gun that eventually caused this'' [disaster] (click here).

Figure 4. Acoustic amplitude, or sound, measurement of banging sound sound, where several successful dives followed.
Figure 4. Acoustic amplitude, or sound, measurement of banging sound sound, where several successful dives followed.
(Image by NTSB)
  Details   DMCA

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, P.E., PMP, ASME Fellow, Who's Who in America Top Engineer, Who's Who Millennium Magazine cover story, NACE Senior Corrosion Technologist, NACE Senior Internal Piping Corrosion Technologist, ANSYS Expert, AMPP Certified (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Book Publisher Wanted for a New Book, "Industrial Murder for Profit"

The Global Warming Fallacy, Polar Warming, Energy Use, and Continental Shifts

More Exposure Of The Fukushima Explosion Cover-up - Stop The Next Nuclear Power Plant Explosion

Are the 737 Jets Safe for Return to Our Skies?

The IAEA Again Thwarts Nuclear Safety to Risk a Zaporizhzhia Explosion Disaster

The CDC Blames Workers for Food Poisonings to Cover-up Their Incompetence

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend