Although I do not agree with Scott Fenstermaker on all the issues we've discussed here, I do not doubt his integrity.
I am shocked that is he simply unaware of all the evidence available online that disproves the official story of 9/11. As we wrangled over the 9/11 truth issue in Part IV, I was not convinced that he was telling us the whole story. And I couldn't believe that he would opt for a "justification" defense, where his client pleads not guilty, then uses the trial to denigrate U.S. Foreign policy.
During our e-mail conversations, I told Mr. Fenstermaker that I was disappointed in our discourse about 9/11 truth. There was one more question I wanted to ask him, but we had moved on to other topics, and Part IV was already posted. My last question about 9/11 truth, and his answer, are posted below.
If there is one statement in these interviews that answers the question: Who is Scott Fenstermaker? It is his reply to the following:
TP: This is what I cannot understand. You flew down to Guantanamo Bay in late November, and discussed legal strategy with Mr. al-Baluchi. You were both aware of allegations that 9/11 was an inside job.
Yet you, or your client, decided on this "justification" defense. Where Mr. al-Baluchi will plead not guilty, then say he took part in this crime because the United States is a bad country. I think this is a tragedy not just for the detainees, but for all of us.
The Obama administration has the nerve, the gall, to put on this show. While millions of Americans and people throughout the world are aware that 9/11 is a lie. Not only would the 9/11 truth defense have a much better chance of winning freedom for the detainees, but this government would finally have to confront the truth in court.
So my question is this: Why did you, or Mr. al-Baluchi, decide that this "justification" defense is in your client's best interests, when you at least knew of allegations that 9/11 was an inside job?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
