34 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 19 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

An Interview With Scott Fenstermaker, Part VII

By       (Page 2 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message A. Scott Piraino

SF: Your question states, among other things, that "the mitigation evidence is still available thanks to the motion filed on Mr. Ghailani's behalf." That is incorrect. I never said that "the mitigation evidence is still available thanks to the motion filed on Mr. Ghailani's behalf." The mitigation evidence would have been available anyway. The motion filed on Mr. Ghailani's behalf merely served as a vehicle for the government to keep the CIA prisons open, nothing more. To give credit to the appointed counsel for the existence of the mitigation evidence is extremely misleading.


Any mitigation evidence would only be relevant at Mr. Ghailani's sentencing proceeding, not his trial. How he was treated by the CIA is not material to the issue of whether he was involved in the Embassy bombings, except to the extent that evidence the government may use was obtained as a result of that treatment. The government has already announced that it has no intention of using evidence obtained as a result of the CIA's mistreatment of Mr. Ghailani.


TP: In another example, Mr. Ghailani's counsel appears to be seeking a mental evaluation of their client, while simultaneously controlling his access to any outside influence. "The lawyers asked to have an expert, presumably a psychiatrist or psychologist, evaluate their client. They asked that the judge not order a separate court evaluation of Mr. Ghailani." "We believe he is in such a fragile state that we can only hazard a guess of what his reaction would be".


Are his lawyers concerned for his mental state, or are they keeping him isolated?


Finally, the story mentions a letter: "Judge Kaplan said he had received a letter, which has not been made public, in which "the defense has raised a question about competency of the defendant."


Can you tell us what you know about this letter?


SF: I can assure you that Mr. Ghailani is highly competent to stand trial. There was nothing wrong with him when I met with him in May and June of 2009. In fact, his behavior toward his appointed counsel is evidence of his competency. He does not, in any way or at any level, want these men as his attorneys. I can assure you that he is objecting to their involvement and their presence on his defense team in the most strenuous of terms. Mr. Ghailani has explained to them that he wants other counsel and that he will not, in any way, cooperate with their efforts. For what I hope are obvious reasons, his appointed counsel will not tolerate Mr. Ghailani's rejection of them. They were hand-picked by the government for a reason, and that was to do the government's bidding in his case. They know that, and more importantly, Mr. Ghailani knows that. He is resisting their efforts by the only means available to him.


Appointed counsels' only weapon to fight Mr. Ghailani's rejection of them is to try and have him declared incompetent. If that happens, then he can't fire them, because nothing he does will have any legal effect. This is a tactic that the military attorneys and the civilian attorneys selected by the military attorneys have used aggressively in the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay. Appointed counsel for Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, Mustafa Bin Ahmed al-Hawsawi, and Rahim al-Nashiri are all currently trying to have their clients declared unfit, for the same reason that Mr. Ghailani's attorneys are trying to do so in New York. The appointed counsel have all been fired, and they refuse to tolerate this treatment. There may be other Guantanamo detainees in the same situation, but I am unaware of whether that is the case.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

A. Scott Piraino Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am a writer living in bucolic Spokane, Washington. It wasn't always this way, back in the day I was a restless wanderer. I left home and traveled to straight to Europe, came back and hitchhiked across America. I joined a carnival, then the (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Third Depression

No World Order

The Crime of the Age

An Interview With Scott Fenstermaker, Part VII

Scott Fenstermaker, the 9/11 Lawyer, Speaks Out

An Interview with Scott Fenstermaker, Part II

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend