Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 82 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Life Arts      

Coffee Talk (short political play)

By       (Page 4 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

John De Herrera
Message John De Herrera
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
                                   PERPLEXED
            No.  The sentiment that it's time to get out the pitchforks.

                                   FORLORN
            Why?

                                   PERPLEXED
            It's insulting to the intelligence.  Not only do mobs have no
            affect on the situation anymore--remember the mobs in the
            street leading up to the invasion?  But mobs will be repelled
            with the military's new toys.  They now have trucks with a
            dish mounted on them that shoot microwaves, that make a crowd
            feel like it's had scalding water poured on them.  The days
            of mobs are gone.

                                   FORLORN
            He wasn't serious.  (To Happy)  You weren't serious.

                                   HAPPY
                          (shrugging shoulders)
            Depends what day of the week it is.

                                   FORLORN
            Lots of folks are angry.  It's not about effectiveness, the
            sentiment.  There's a real anger out there.

                                   HAPPY
            I'd prefer a disgusted mob to an angry one--a mob that would
            just clean out the muck that's accumulated in the halls of
            power.

                                   PERPLEXED
            If it's a sarcastic jest, well OK.  But still, it's
            insulting.  It's insincere at worst, and ignorant at best.
            It's like saying "Let's bang our head on the wall some more,
            so we can feel better about banging our head on the wall."
            It's just more static noise when we need clarity about where
            we are, if we're ever going to get to where we want to be.  I
            don't mind anger--indignance, but what are unruly mobs going
            to do?  Corporate media would and will brand them as
            seditious.  And then what?  A lot of energy wasted.  Energy
            that could've been better used towards cleaning out the muck.

                                   FORLORN
            Except the first step out of mind-numbed, is anger.  Like
            Howard Beal said, "...mad as hell and not going to take it
            anymore...."  Shout it out the window.  People who tune out
            have to get angry.  I agree about thoughtfulness against
            foolishness, but I also see the validity of plain rage, the
            rage that gets statues toppled and walls brought down.

                                   PERPLEXED
            Think about what you're saying.  It's been over a year since
            we voted in a dem majority.  Collective anger already peaked,
            we're on the downhill to numbness.

                                   HAPPY
            I didn't mean to be taken literally.  I have no desire to be
            tased or pepper-sprayed or waterboarded or microwaved either.
            My point is that we need to saddle up and get busy.
            Together.  To run these yahoos out of town on a rail.  We
            need--as she suggests--to remember who the criminals are.
            And we need to apply pressure.  Not literally with torches
            and pitchforks, but with the voting booth and congressional
            subpoenas.

                                   PERPLEXED
            Get busy voting?  Subpoenas?  We have two choices: Democrat
            or Republican, and both are status quo.  Subpoenas haven't
            been part of the landscape all through this administration.
            The idea of voting change into existence is another insult to
            intelligence?  Not mine in particular, but in general.  Do
            you honestly believe voting or e-mailing Congress is going to
            turn the ship around?  Do you honestly believe that?
            If you do, then I'd suggest you take a deeper look at the
            situation--and especially since we "voted" in a dem majority.

                                   FORLORN
            Good lord, here it comes, right?  Your spiel about a
            constitutional convention?  I've heard you discuss it in here
            before.

                                   (During the following, OBTUSE pours a
                                   COFFEE, and near the end, sits on
                                   couch.)

                                   PERPLEXED
            You two are the ones who want to get out torches and
            pitchforks.  You're the ones who are angry.  Are you serious?
            Do you feel like you'd want to march on the Capitol?  I just
            made a vow I wasn't going to talk politics anymore.  But
            listening to you, I can't tell if I should wait still longer.
            I can continue, saying what I've been saying, or I can accept
            it's too late, and learn to make peace with that.  Or I can
            get angry at the ignorance and insincerity and become
            disliked.  Or I can leave you to play make-believe, and just
            try and joyfully participate in the mess.  But let's face it:
            the voting system is compromised; Congress isn't going to
            solve a problem it created, and voting is about to become a
            figment of our imagination--much as it's currently a figment
            of the imagination that the next presidential administration
            will sever the link between corporate interests and
            governance.  It's as if there are stratas of understanding.
            Some people are eager to see candidates go on and on about
            the need for change, expecting real change, when no one's
            platform proposes real change from...from--the governance of
            common criminals.

                                   PERPLEXED (CONT'D)
            Then there's another strata of understanding, those of us who
            realize the bluff has been called, and the cards put upon the
            table.  The country voted Democrats in, yet nothing's
            changed.  And yet you're sitting here quipping about torches
            and pitchforks, and voting machines and subpoenas.  What
            gives?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

John De Herrera Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. Advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Patricia Arquette & Chuck Norris Engaged

Letter To The Dalai Lama

Radiant and Piercing

Rebuke Of Op-Ed News Contributers

Hamlet 5:2

Hamlet 3:2

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend