Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H4'ed 6/28/19

Simon Critchley on Tragedy's Philosophy (REVIEW ESSAY)

By       (Page 4 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   No comments
Author 38575
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

As a thought experiment, we might imagine changing Critchley's word "certitude" in his summation of thesis 12 to the word "probability" to wit, "the mood [of Greek tragedy] is skeptical, it is about the dissolution of all markers of probability." I know, I know, Critchley wants to tout being skeptical, instead of trying to formulate philosophical probabilities. But isn't it possible that Plato and then Aristotle first grasped the skeptical dimension of Greek tragedies and then tried to the best of their abilities to construct philosophical probabilities as an alternative way to think about the world? In other words, why was Western philosophical reasoning invented?

After all, Critchley himself claims to be developing tragedy's philosophy. But if there were not good reasons for inventing Western philosophy in the first place, can there now possibly be good reasons for developing tragedy's philosophy?

In chapter 21 (pages 98-100), Critchley says, "On the topic of his [Gorgias'] teaching and method, Gorgias did not teach any set of doctrines, but a method, a hodos, which was, in his view, value-free. He gave the highest status to the power of rhetoric" (page 100). But isn't the highest status a value? It doesn't sound value-free.

In any event, the Canadian Jesuit philosopher and theologian Bernard Lonergan (1904-1984) develops a generalized empirical method (hodos) in his philosophical masterpiece Insight: A Study of Human Understanding, 5th ed., edited by Frederick E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran (University of Toronto Press, 1992; 1st ed., 1957).

John Angus Campbell, who is not a Roman Catholic, published the article "Insight and Understanding: The 'Common Sense' Rhetoric of Bernard Lonergan" in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, volume 71 (1985): pages 476-488. Later, he revised and expanded it in the ambitious 1993 anthology Communication and Lonergan: Common Ground for Forging the New Age (pages 3-22), mentioned above. In other words, Campbell considers Lonergan's generalized empirical method for philosophical (and theological) discourse to be a "common sense" rhetoric.

In chapter 26 (pages 119-122), Critchley says, "Tragedy is a symptom of the fifth-century linguistic turn [from what?] that placed enormous value on rationality, argumentation, and persuasion. Reason is essential to the experience of tragedy" (page 119; I've added the question in brackets).

In chapter 4 (pages 17-20), Critchley says, "The most common topics in ancient tragedies are connected with the events preceding or succeeding the Trojan War and the affairs of the House of Atreus and the Palace of Thebes" (pages 17-18).

Because ancient Greek culture represents one example of an honor-shame culture, perhaps we can see Greek epic poetry as exemplifying heroic honor. By contrast, the poetry in Greek tragedies exemplifies shame.

In chapter 3 (pages 12-16), Critchley says, "Greek tragedy provides lessons in shame" (page 16).

When we put these pieces together, "the fifth-century linguistic turn" (page 119) seems to be a turn from poetry centered on heroic honor to poetry centered on tragic shame.

Now, the personal experience of shame is connected with early childhood traumatic experiences, according to John Bradshaw in his book Healing the Shame That Binds You, 2nd ed. (Health Communications, 2005; 1st ed., 1988). Simply stated, if you have ever experienced road rage, such as the road rage we learn about in Sophocles' play Oedipus the King, then you are probably suffering from shame that binds you deep within your psyche.

Now, apart from Critchley's explicitly argued twelve theses, the theme of grief emerges in his book (pages 9, 10, 17-20, 168, 186, and 275-277). But he does not happen to advert explicitly to the death of Socrates and Plato's mourning his death by commemorating his life-spirit in the character known as Socrates in his dialogues. Plato's mourning the death of Socrates probably involved experiencing anger and rage.

In Susan Anderson's book The Journey from Abandonment to Healing, 2nd ed. (Berkley Books/ Penguin Group, 2014; 1st ed., 2000), she describes and explains five stages that people usually go through when they feel abandoned by the loss of an important relationship or the death of a loved one. One stage is rage. Plato most likely experienced rage as part of his mourning the death of Socrates. But Anderson also describes a subsequent stage in the mourning process as lifting.

In the Iliad, King Agamemnon seriously dishonors King Achilles by taking Briseis away from him. Achilles is understandably enraged. He is ready to dispatch Agamemnon on the spot. But the goddess Athena intervenes and stops Achilles forcibly. She urges him, instead, to give Agamemnon a well-deserved tongue-lashing, which Achilles does.

With this famous example in mind, I can imagine Plato writing the Apology in the full force of rage over the death of Socrates. But I suspect that the full force of Plato's rage had lifted (in Anderson's terminology) by the time he wrote the Republic.

Even though mourning is a prominent theme in Critchley's new book, he does not draw on Anderson's book or any comparable books about the mourning process.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church