a) Sham Conditional Decree record of the Israeli Supreme Court issued in response to a Petition for Conditional Decree in Ometz et al v Lahyani et al (6549/13), b) True Conditional Decree form from the Israeli Regulations of High Court of Justice Procedures.
The sham decree is titled "Decision" instead of "Conditional Decree", fails to refer to the paper as a summons, and is signed by a judge, instead of being duly signed by the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court. Since 2002 the Supreme Court, absent lawfully appointed Chief Clerk, the Supreme Court subverts the Conditional Decree process, key process for protection of rights in Israel. Absent issuance of the Conditional Decree, equivalent to summons in a case of original jurisdiction, the Court acts with no jurisdiction at all. [xi]
As is the case in the courts of other nations, which originated in the English common law, the role of the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court is essential for integrity of the Court and its competency. The duties and responsibilities of the Chief Clerk include the following:
* Custody of the court's records and the safeguard of their integrity -- the Human Rights Alert submission to the United Nations documented the falsification of numerous Supreme Court records during the period of Sarah Lifschitz's false appearance as "Chief Clerk".
* Honest registration of papers filed by parties in court -- the correspondence, which eventually led to the fraud complaint against Presiding Justice Asher Grunis, documented false and deliberately misleading registration of petitions to the Supreme Court.
* Notice and service of court decisions and their authentication -- since 2002, all Supreme Court decisions are served unsigned, unauthenticated, and "subject to editing and phrasing changes". Such records cannot be deemed valid judicial record by any legal standard.
* Certification of court decisions "True Copy of the Original" - the fraud complaint against "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz documented false and deliberately misleading certification of Supreme Court decision records. (see below)
* Issuance of decrees on parties to appear in court in petitions for conditional decrees -- since 2002, no such decrees are issued. The conditional decrees are akin to summonses in cases of original jurisdiction by the Supreme Court. Through such decrees, the Supreme Court gains jurisdiction over the parties and matter in question. Conditional decrees are a central mechanism for the protection of rights against State authorities in the law of the State of Israel. Effectively, since 2002, the Supreme Court has been conducting sham review of petitions for conditional decree, with no jurisdiction at all.
by Joseph Zernik
Sham summons in Ben Yaakov v Rolnick (53747-02-12) in the Tel Aviv District Court. Similar to changes that took place in the Supreme Court since 2002, fraudulent computer systems were implemented also in the district and magistrate courts in Israel (Net HaMishpat) from 2002-2010. Summonses today are not dated, bear no name of a clerk, no signature, and no seal of the court. Such records cannot be deemed valid court records by any legal standard, and process that is commenced through such summonses should be deemed sham litigation. [xii]
F. Fraud complaints against "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz and Presiding Justice Asher Grunis of the Israeli Supreme Court (2012-2013) [xiii, xiv, xv, xvi]
The June 2, 2013 and a previous April 16, 2012 fraud complaint against "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz of the Israeli Supreme Court documented that Sarah Lifschitz:
* Appeared as "Chief Clerk" with no lawful appointment record for over ten years. and
* Issued false certifications of Supreme Court records.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
