Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 78 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/20/15  

Children of a Lesser God, Part 1

By       (Page 4 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   3 comments

Richard Girard
Message Richard Girard
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

In 1978, a member of the wealthiest one-one-hundredth of one percent had 220 times the wealth of the average American. In 2012, that same one American in ten-thousand had more than 1100 times as much as the average American, an increase of 400 percent.

In 1957, the year after I was born, Fortune magazine published a list of the wealthiest Americans. Of the 76 individuals and family trusts listed, 47 had fortunes in excess of $100 million dollars. When one adjusts the numbers for inflation, those are the individuals and trusts who had the equivalent of $1 billion dollars or more in 2014 money. Only one of those 47 individuals had a personal fortune of more than $1 billion 1957 dollars: oil man J. Paul Getty. With inflation and the doubling of our population, if the distribution of wealth had continued as it had in the 1950's, the United States should have a little over 100 billionaires today.

According to Forbes magazine in 2013, we had 492, almost five times as many as we should have if the distribution of wealth remained constant in this country. Their wealth came out of the pockets of the poor, working, and middle-classes, not by any creation of additional wealth for this country. As I stated earlier: the poor, working, and middle-classes have lost about fifteen percent of the nation's income, and more than twenty percent of the wealth in the last forty years, and has effectively found it's wages stagnant (in terms of constant dollars, i.e., $1.00 = one dollar in 2015). If you aren't making more than $250,000 per year, or its equivalent in constant dollars, for your whole forty-year working career, or whatever part of that forty-year cycle you are currently in, then you are losing ground, or barely breaking even.

Gaming the System

Paul Buchheit published an earlier article on AlterNet on 9 February 2014, titled, "5 Ways Rich People's Entitlements Cheat You and Me." Professor Buchheit begins the article with the following paragraphs:

"The word 'entitlement' is ambiguous. For working people it means 'earned benefits.' For the rich, the concept of entitlement is compatible with the Merriam-Webster definition: 'The feeling or belief that you deserve to be given something (such as special privileges).' Recent studies agree, concluding that higher social class is associated with increased entitlement and narcissism.

The sense of entitlement among the very rich is understandable, for it helps them to justify the massive redistribution of wealth that has occurred over the past 65 years, especially in the past 30 years. National investment in infrastructure, technology, and security has made America a rich country. The financial industry has used our publicly-developed communications technology to generate trillions of dollars in new earnings, while national security protects their interests. The major beneficiaries have convinced themselves they did it on their own. They believe they're entitled to it all."

This is the reason I have for the last several years tried very hard to not describe programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP (food stamps), unemployment, etc., as "entitlements," but as "social insurance." These are programs we all contribute to (in theory) for those times we might discover ourselves in need of assistance, such as a downturn in the economy when we lose our job.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Girard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Richard Girard is a polymath and autodidact whose greatest desire in life is to be his generations' Thomas Paine. He is an FDR Democrat, which probably puts him with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders in the current political spectrum. His answer to (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Social Capitalism

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend